From: Katsumi Yamaoka <yamaoka@jpl.org>
Subject: Re: Gnus slow?
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 14:32:32 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b9y3bzbd6dr.fsf@jpl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <873bzf6umt.fsf@orebokech.com>
>>>>> In <873bzf6umt.fsf@orebokech.com> Romain Francoise wrote:
> Did you find out why groups are activated twice?
Hmm, the last message I wrote doesn't indeed make sense. I must
return to an English writing course. Let me exercise again. :-p
The reason the recent Gnus uselessly issues the GROUP command
for all the subscribed nntp groups is that the nntp marks feature
provides the `nntp-request-update-info' function. It always
returns a non-nil value. When executing the `g' command, it is
called by the `gnus-get-unread-articles-in-group' function by
way of the `gnus-request-update-info' function. If it returns a
non-nil value, the `gnus-activate-group' function is called with
the third argument `t' and the GROUP command is issued. Before
May 13, `gnus-request-update-info' returned nil because the
`nntp-request-update-info' function didn't exist then.
Anyway, I've installed the change which makes
`nntp-request-update-info' return nil if `nntp-marks-is-evil' is
non-nil. Please test!
Note that you have to rebuild Gnus rather than replacing nntp.el
with the new one since the function in question is inlined in
some places.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-15 5:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-10 12:47 Katsumi Yamaoka
2004-11-10 13:05 ` Romain Francoise
2004-11-10 14:39 ` Gabor Z.Papp
2004-11-10 18:41 ` Jesper Harder
2004-11-10 23:40 ` Katsumi Yamaoka
2004-11-11 11:47 ` Romain Francoise
2004-11-12 7:27 ` Katsumi Yamaoka
2004-11-12 8:20 ` Romain Francoise
2004-11-12 9:06 ` Katsumi Yamaoka
2004-11-12 13:15 ` Katsumi Yamaoka
2004-11-12 13:53 ` Romain Francoise
2004-11-15 5:32 ` Katsumi Yamaoka [this message]
2004-11-15 13:26 ` Romain Francoise
2004-11-15 16:40 ` Dan Christensen
2004-11-16 16:17 ` Reiner Steib
2004-11-16 20:41 ` Dan Christensen
2004-11-16 21:21 ` Romain Francoise
2004-11-16 21:51 ` Simon Josefsson
2004-11-17 15:22 ` Frank Schmitt
2004-11-17 19:57 ` Romain Francoise
2004-11-18 11:04 ` Frank Schmitt
2004-11-19 7:28 ` Romain Francoise
2004-11-19 14:17 ` Kai Grossjohann
2004-11-19 22:14 ` Frank Schmitt
2004-11-20 16:49 ` Kai Grossjohann
2004-11-20 20:39 ` nnimap syncing (was: Gnus slow?) Steven E. Harris
2004-11-20 22:58 ` nnimap syncing Simon Josefsson
2004-11-22 0:59 ` Gnus slow? Katsumi Yamaoka
2004-11-22 7:57 ` Matt Armstrong
2004-11-22 8:58 ` Kai Grossjohann
2004-11-23 20:43 ` Romain Francoise
2004-11-25 0:19 ` Katsumi Yamaoka
2004-11-25 7:41 ` Romain Francoise
2004-11-25 7:55 ` Katsumi Yamaoka
2004-11-11 7:16 ` Adam Sjøgren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b9y3bzbd6dr.fsf@jpl.org \
--to=yamaoka@jpl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).