From: Katsumi Yamaoka <yamaoka@jpl.org>
Subject: Re: Gnus slow?
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 16:27:52 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b9y8y97msqv.fsf@jpl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87r7n0zjx9.fsf@orebokech.com>
I also tried ELP on No Gnus v0.2 and the latest CVS. The result
is that the latest CVS is faster than No Gnus v0.2 10 to 20%.
It will be meaningless to compare it with your result since I
subscribe to two foreign servers using nntp-open-via-(ssh and
telnet), the local news server, many shimbun groups and the nnml
groups, though.
>>>>> In <87r7n0zjx9.fsf@orebokech.com> Romain Francoise wrote:
(No Gnus checkout as of May 12th)
> Package gnus, version A (first 10 lines):
> Function Name Call Count Elapsed Time Average Time
> ================================ ========== ============ ============
> gnus-activate-group 405 0.6969249999 0.0017208024
(the latest CVS)
> Package gnus, version B (first 10 lines):
> Function Name Call Count Elapsed Time Average Time
> ================================ ========== ============ ============
> gnus-activate-group 808 28.273399000 0.0349918304
> - version B activates twice as many groups as version A.
I don't know why gnus-activate-group spends so many time and
seems to be called twice in B, but it is dominant.
Some gnus-* functions are inlined in it and they cannot be
profiled by ELP individually. So, you need to plunge a scalpel
into those adhesion. To do that, replace all the
`(inline (gnus-* ...))' forms into `(gnus-* ...)' in the
gnus-activate-group function and recompile gnus-start.el.
Otherwise, it may be enough to only evaluate the function
definition of gnus-activate-group using `M-x eval-region' or
`M-x eval-last-sexp' (`C-x C-e').
And then, perform ELP to the `gnus' package again.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-12 7:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-10 12:47 Katsumi Yamaoka
2004-11-10 13:05 ` Romain Francoise
2004-11-10 14:39 ` Gabor Z.Papp
2004-11-10 18:41 ` Jesper Harder
2004-11-10 23:40 ` Katsumi Yamaoka
2004-11-11 11:47 ` Romain Francoise
2004-11-12 7:27 ` Katsumi Yamaoka [this message]
2004-11-12 8:20 ` Romain Francoise
2004-11-12 9:06 ` Katsumi Yamaoka
2004-11-12 13:15 ` Katsumi Yamaoka
2004-11-12 13:53 ` Romain Francoise
2004-11-15 5:32 ` Katsumi Yamaoka
2004-11-15 13:26 ` Romain Francoise
2004-11-15 16:40 ` Dan Christensen
2004-11-16 16:17 ` Reiner Steib
2004-11-16 20:41 ` Dan Christensen
2004-11-16 21:21 ` Romain Francoise
2004-11-16 21:51 ` Simon Josefsson
2004-11-17 15:22 ` Frank Schmitt
2004-11-17 19:57 ` Romain Francoise
2004-11-18 11:04 ` Frank Schmitt
2004-11-19 7:28 ` Romain Francoise
2004-11-19 14:17 ` Kai Grossjohann
2004-11-19 22:14 ` Frank Schmitt
2004-11-20 16:49 ` Kai Grossjohann
2004-11-20 20:39 ` nnimap syncing (was: Gnus slow?) Steven E. Harris
2004-11-20 22:58 ` nnimap syncing Simon Josefsson
2004-11-22 0:59 ` Gnus slow? Katsumi Yamaoka
2004-11-22 7:57 ` Matt Armstrong
2004-11-22 8:58 ` Kai Grossjohann
2004-11-23 20:43 ` Romain Francoise
2004-11-25 0:19 ` Katsumi Yamaoka
2004-11-25 7:41 ` Romain Francoise
2004-11-25 7:55 ` Katsumi Yamaoka
2004-11-11 7:16 ` Adam Sjøgren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b9y8y97msqv.fsf@jpl.org \
--to=yamaoka@jpl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).