Re: Sync of Gnus with Emacs

[Katsumi Yamaoka <yamaoka@jpl.org>]

>>>>> In <v93c2baa45.fsf@marauder.physik.uni-ulm.de>
>>>>>	Reiner Steib <4.uce.03.r.s@nurfuerspam.de> wrote:

> On Wed, Aug 25 2004, Katsumi Yamaoka wrote:

>> I switched Gnus to v5-10.  Oh, how old this is!  I flinched.
>> Although I never make light of it, I like latest version very
>> much even if there may be some bugs. ;-)

> Are all the goodies you are missing from No Gnus mentioned in
> texi/gnus-news.texi?

I was being dizzy by the absence of some new features. ;-)

>> Isn't deleting Emacs 20 stuff necessity?  How about XEmacs stuff?
>> It includes replacing of gnus-point-at-bol with point-at-bol,
>> using of with-syntax-table and a lot of other things.

> I would leave those things in as they are.  Maybe there will be a
> 5.10.7 from this branch as Simon suggested (I don't know about Lars'
> opinion, though).  I don't think that any XEmacs compatibility code in
> the Emacs-bundled Gnus versions has been erased in the past.

I see.  I decided to leave them for the time being.

>> mm-inline-text-html-render-with-w3m doesn't work with the latest
>> released version of emacs-w3m.  May I change it and related stuff?
>> It is not a bugfix, though.  The emacs-w3m team aren't interested
>> in maintaining of old versions of emacs-w3m.

> If `mm-inline-text-html-render-with-w3m' doesn't work in v5-10, I
> would consider it as a bug that should be fixed.

I've commited the changes.  I'll ask the emacs-w3m team also for
confirming of it.

>> What date should we use for the ChangeLog entries?

> The date when you install the change in the branch.

I did so.  I'll investigate other things from now on.

Thank you,