From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/58348 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Katsumi Yamaoka Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Sync of Gnus with Emacs Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 18:26:50 +0900 Organization: Emacsen advocacy group Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <4nvff9lu28.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1093426069 17750 80.91.224.253 (25 Aug 2004 09:27:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 09:27:49 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ding-owner+M6889@lists.math.uh.edu Wed Aug 25 11:27:41 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Bzu4C-0006Hh-00 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 11:27:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1Bzu3c-0002gd-00; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 04:27:04 -0500 Original-Received: from util2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.23]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1Bzu3X-0002gY-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 04:26:59 -0500 Original-Received: from justine.libertine.org ([66.139.78.221] ident=postfix) by util2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1Bzu3U-0007Iz-PK for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 04:26:56 -0500 Original-Received: from washington.hostforweb.net (washington.hostforweb.net [69.61.11.2]) by justine.libertine.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BEA63A004B for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 04:26:55 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by washington.hostforweb.net with asmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1Bzu3T-0005fQ-84 for ding@gnus.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 05:26:55 -0400 Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Face: #kKnN,xUnmKia.'[pp`;Omh}odZK)?7wQSl"4o04=EixTF+V[""w~iNbM9ZL+.b*_CxUmFk B#Fu[*?MZZH@IkN:!"\w%I_zt>[$nm7nQosZ<3eu;B:$Q_:p!',P.c0-_Cy[dz4oIpw0ESA^D*1Lw= L&i*6&( User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:Oboc6Yp7UdsYetT+O2h4nOMgN8M= X-Hashcash: 0:040825:ding@gnus.org:2de411bd745eaf54 X-Antivirus-Scanner: Clean mail though you should still use an Antivirus X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - washington.hostforweb.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - gnus.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - jpl.org X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Precedence: bulk Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:58348 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:58348 >>>>> In >>>>> Reiner Steib <4.uce.03.r.s@nurfuerspam.de> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 25 2004, Katsumi Yamaoka wrote: >> I switched Gnus to v5-10. Oh, how old this is! I flinched. >> Although I never make light of it, I like latest version very >> much even if there may be some bugs. ;-) > Are all the goodies you are missing from No Gnus mentioned in > texi/gnus-news.texi? I was being dizzy by the absence of some new features. ;-) >> Isn't deleting Emacs 20 stuff necessity? How about XEmacs stuff? >> It includes replacing of gnus-point-at-bol with point-at-bol, >> using of with-syntax-table and a lot of other things. > I would leave those things in as they are. Maybe there will be a > 5.10.7 from this branch as Simon suggested (I don't know about Lars' > opinion, though). I don't think that any XEmacs compatibility code in > the Emacs-bundled Gnus versions has been erased in the past. I see. I decided to leave them for the time being. >> mm-inline-text-html-render-with-w3m doesn't work with the latest >> released version of emacs-w3m. May I change it and related stuff? >> It is not a bugfix, though. The emacs-w3m team aren't interested >> in maintaining of old versions of emacs-w3m. > If `mm-inline-text-html-render-with-w3m' doesn't work in v5-10, I > would consider it as a bug that should be fixed. I've commited the changes. I'll ask the emacs-w3m team also for confirming of it. >> What date should we use for the ChangeLog entries? > The date when you install the change in the branch. I did so. I'll investigate other things from now on. Thank you,