From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/59298 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Katsumi Yamaoka Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Bug: spam articles not processed Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 10:26:06 +0900 Organization: Emacsen advocacy group Message-ID: References: <4n7jokbj24.fsf@lifelogs.com> <4nu0rclmrx.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1101691714 9126 80.91.229.6 (29 Nov 2004 01:28:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 01:28:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M7838@lists.math.uh.edu Mon Nov 29 02:28:27 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13] ident=mail) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CYaL4-0004lR-00 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 02:28:26 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1CYaJ5-0006H2-00; Sun, 28 Nov 2004 19:26:23 -0600 Original-Received: from util2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.23]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1CYaJ0-0006Gx-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sun, 28 Nov 2004 19:26:18 -0600 Original-Received: from justine.libertine.org ([66.139.78.221] ident=postfix) by util2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1CYaIy-0003KG-Bh for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sun, 28 Nov 2004 19:26:16 -0600 Original-Received: from washington.hostforweb.net (washington.hostforweb.net [69.61.11.2]) by justine.libertine.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 004263A003C for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2004 19:26:13 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by washington.hostforweb.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.42) id 1CYaIy-0007FW-O5; Sun, 28 Nov 2004 20:26:17 -0500 Original-To: "Jan Rychter" X-Face: #kKnN,xUnmKia.'[pp`;Omh}odZK)?7wQSl"4o04=EixTF+V[""w~iNbM9ZL+.b*_CxUmFk B#Fu[*?MZZH@IkN:!"\w%I_zt>[$nm7nQosZ<3eu;B:$Q_:p!',P.c0-_Cy[dz4oIpw0ESA^D*1Lw= L&i*6&( User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:mNkeJfB7pb2ptHPJ9KuVYsAOr5Y= X-Hashcash: 1:20:041129:jan@rychter.com::sivQnP4xfu3xs+sV:00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000005YVk X-Hashcash: 1:20:041129:ding@gnus.org::OtBm3FMRnVr27rnC:00000T9G X-Antivirus-Scanner: Clean mail though you should still use an Antivirus X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - washington.hostforweb.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - gnus.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - jpl.org X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Precedence: bulk Original-Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:59298 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:59298 >>>>> In <4nu0rclmrx.fsf@lifelogs.com> Ted Zlatanov wrote: > On Tue, 23 Nov 2004, jan@rychter.com wrote: >>>>>>> "Ted" == Ted Zlatanov writes: >> Ted> I am not familiar with limits, so would it work to call >> Ted> gnus-summary-pop-limit with universal-argument or is there a >> Ted> better way to do it? >> >> I'm sorry -- I'm afraid I won't be able to help you here. I was quite >> surprised that spam processing would be based on the final contents of >> the summary buffer at all. > I tested and comitted the change. Please let me know if it works well. I'm sorry I don't know what Jan and Ted intend to do, but the code `(universal-argument (gnus-summary-pop-limit))' doesn't make seance to me. ;-) While compiling spam-summary-prepare-exit in file gnus/lisp/spam.el: ** universal-argument called with 1 argument, but accepts only 0