From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/59092 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Katsumi Yamaoka Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Gnus slow? Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 21:47:11 +0900 Organization: Emacsen advocacy group Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1100091048 20252 80.91.229.6 (10 Nov 2004 12:50:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 12:50:48 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ding-owner+M7632@lists.math.uh.edu Wed Nov 10 13:50:33 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13] ident=mail) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CRrvl-0002Wj-00 for ; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 13:50:33 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1CRrsz-0005Wl-00; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 06:47:41 -0600 Original-Received: from util2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.23]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1CRrsr-0005Wd-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 06:47:33 -0600 Original-Received: from justine.libertine.org ([66.139.78.221] ident=postfix) by util2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1CRrsf-0004fE-1T for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 06:47:21 -0600 Original-Received: from washington.hostforweb.net (washington.hostforweb.net [69.61.11.2]) by justine.libertine.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 434343A0026 for ; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 06:47:16 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by washington.hostforweb.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.42) id 1CRrsa-0001D1-5R for ding@gnus.org; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 07:47:16 -0500 Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Face: #kKnN,xUnmKia.'[pp`;Omh}odZK)?7wQSl"4o04=EixTF+V[""w~iNbM9ZL+.b*_CxUmFk B#Fu[*?MZZH@IkN:!"\w%I_zt>[$nm7nQosZ<3eu;B:$Q_:p!',P.c0-_Cy[dz4oIpw0ESA^D*1Lw= L&i*6&( User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:lK4YfKHV/gin7LB4UPPrH1AOFvQ= X-Hashcash: 1:17:041110:ding@gnus.org::9mCplfEJuTM6oSN1:00000JAS X-Antivirus-Scanner: Clean mail though you should still use an Antivirus X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - washington.hostforweb.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - gnus.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - jpl.org X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Precedence: bulk Original-Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:59092 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:59092 Hi, First of all, I don't have any difficulty in using Gnus. Today I'm using both No Gnus v0.2 and latest Gnus CVS for a while, but I was not able to find out a remarkable difference of speed between them so far. However, a friend of mine wrote to me that the recent Gnus is much slower than No Gnus v0.2 for fetching mails. IIRC, I also have heard similar utterances by several people in groups and mailing lists. Exceptionally, since Gnus became slowdown obviously when the nntp marks feature was introduced, I set `nntp-marks-is-evil' as t and removed all nntp marks files. I haven't changed the value of `nntp-marks-is-evil' since then. Didn't anyone experience the slowness of Gnus like them? Was it already solved? Any informations are appreciated and will help them. Best regards,