From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/59121 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Katsumi Yamaoka Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Gnus slow? Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 18:06:22 +0900 Organization: Emacsen advocacy group Message-ID: References: <87sm7hua65.fsf@orebokech.com> <87r7n0zjx9.fsf@orebokech.com> <87u0rv8on2.fsf@orebokech.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1100250537 28699 80.91.229.6 (12 Nov 2004 09:08:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 09:08:57 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ding-owner+M7661@lists.math.uh.edu Fri Nov 12 10:08:40 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13] ident=mail) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CSXQ8-0000Eq-00 for ; Fri, 12 Nov 2004 10:08:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1CSXOH-0004VI-00; Fri, 12 Nov 2004 03:06:45 -0600 Original-Received: from util2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.23]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1CSXO8-0004VA-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 12 Nov 2004 03:06:36 -0600 Original-Received: from justine.libertine.org ([66.139.78.221] ident=postfix) by util2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1CSXO4-0007ep-Qw for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 12 Nov 2004 03:06:32 -0600 Original-Received: from washington.hostforweb.net (washington.hostforweb.net [69.61.11.2]) by justine.libertine.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 346843A004D for ; Fri, 12 Nov 2004 03:06:31 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by washington.hostforweb.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.42) id 1CSXO0-0001fd-SQ for ding@gnus.org; Fri, 12 Nov 2004 04:06:29 -0500 Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Face: #kKnN,xUnmKia.'[pp`;Omh}odZK)?7wQSl"4o04=EixTF+V[""w~iNbM9ZL+.b*_CxUmFk B#Fu[*?MZZH@IkN:!"\w%I_zt>[$nm7nQosZ<3eu;B:$Q_:p!',P.c0-_Cy[dz4oIpw0ESA^D*1Lw= L&i*6&( User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:pO6gkC6BancVDhDyPz7ItD9x528= X-Hashcash: 1:17:041112:ding@gnus.org::CR+H8aAKlIx7NKky:00000K96 X-Antivirus-Scanner: Clean mail though you should still use an Antivirus X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - washington.hostforweb.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - gnus.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - jpl.org X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Precedence: bulk Original-Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:59121 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:59121 You might not need to perform ELP again. >>>>> In <87u0rv8on2.fsf@orebokech.com> Romain Francoise wrote: >> I don't know why gnus-activate-group spends so many time and >> seems to be called twice in B, but it is dominant. It seems to be caused by calling nntp-request-group by way of gnus-request-group. It should have been clear if I looked at the nntp profile which you got. Probably, we should clarify the reason why it is called frequently. > It is slow because in version B, Gnus issues GROUP commands to the NNTP > server and it is synchronous so it has to wait for the answer from the > server. To make it worse, it does it twice since groups are activated > twice. > You will find captures of the NNTP conversation between Gnus and > news.gmane.org here: . Version A > issues LIST ACTIVE commands only, asynchronously. Version B first > issues GROUP commands for each of my groups, synchronously, then issues > LIST ACTIVE commands like version A, then does GROUP commands again. I > see two separate issues: > - why does version B send GROUP commands where version A doesn't? They > seem unnecessary. > - even so, why does version B send them twice? I saw those captures. Thanks.