Re: new logo candidates

[Katsumi Yamaoka <yamaoka@jpl.org>]

>>>>> In <sdy8sijh0g.fsf@wanderer.hardakers.net>
>>>>>	Wes Hardaker <wes@hardakers.net> wrote:

Steinar> Can't you write to a PNG instead of an XPM?

> Yeah, but I didn't know if we'd like that or not.  Traditionally all
> the graphics files have been xpm since they're more supported by the
> "older" versions of [X]Emacs.  Anyway, I actually submitted another
> logo that hasn't made it by the moderators queue yet (too large and
> all; the pop account holders probably hate me) which I like the best
> so far and works just fine as an XPM.

The advantage of XPM is being able to change colors easily by
the program.  However, when there are many colors, e.g., a
lifelike gnu, it is not sure.

>>>>> In <sdisjngz5z.fsf@wanderer.hardakers.net>
>>>>>	Wes Hardaker <wes@hardakers.net> wrote:

>>>>>> On Thu, 08 Jan 2004 07:14:48 +1000, Steve Youngs <sryoungs@bigpond.net.au> said:

SY> They're all nice.  How do they look if you use the current splash
SY> colours ("#ff0000" "#ffff00") on the gnu?

> What do you think of my new favorite:

I like it very much!
BTW, how about metallic gnu?  Here's an example:

ftp://ftp.jpl.org/pub/tmp/xemacs-gold.xpm

I made it using xv and netpbm, but it took a long time.
-- 
Katsumi Yamaoka <yamaoka@jpl.org>