* No process-mark for gnus-summary-save-parts?
@ 2005-02-15 16:46 Andrew Raines
2005-02-16 4:03 ` Katsumi Yamaoka
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Raines @ 2005-02-15 16:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
gnus-summary-save-parts doesn't seem to care about process
marks, despite (info "(gnus)MIME Commands") saying it does.
Specifically, I'm trying to save all of the message/rfc822
parts of messages in a group. It works great for a single
article, but doesn't iteratively do marked messages. I also
tried a keyboard macro, but nothing got saved to the
directory I specified.
In gnus-sum.el, g-s-s-p's interactive block refers to
current-prefix-arg, but the variable isn't used in the
function. Is this author oversight or am I missing
something?
--
aaraines@pobox.com (Andrew A. Raines)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: No process-mark for gnus-summary-save-parts?
2005-02-15 16:46 No process-mark for gnus-summary-save-parts? Andrew Raines
@ 2005-02-16 4:03 ` Katsumi Yamaoka
2005-02-16 16:04 ` Andrew Raines
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Katsumi Yamaoka @ 2005-02-16 4:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
>>>>> In <87zmy5ydnw.fsf@mid.packer.its.vanderbilt.edu> Andrew Raines wrote:
> gnus-summary-save-parts doesn't seem to care about process
> marks, despite (info "(gnus)MIME Commands") saying it does.
> Specifically, I'm trying to save all of the message/rfc822
> parts of messages in a group. It works great for a single
> article, but doesn't iteratively do marked messages. I also
> tried a keyboard macro, but nothing got saved to the
> directory I specified.
Hm, it works for me. What I did for the trial is:
Make two of forwarded articles in the nnml group.
Mark those articles by #.
Type X m message/rfc822 RET /tmp/ RET.
Remove two of saved files.
Go to the first article in the summary buffer.
Type 2 X m message/rfc822 RET /tmp/ RET.
> In gnus-sum.el, g-s-s-p's interactive block refers to
> current-prefix-arg, but the variable isn't used in the
> function. Is this author oversight or am I missing
> something?
current-prefix-arg is passed to the gnus-summary-iterate macro
and it seems to process marks and a numeric arg properly.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: No process-mark for gnus-summary-save-parts?
2005-02-16 4:03 ` Katsumi Yamaoka
@ 2005-02-16 16:04 ` Andrew Raines
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Raines @ 2005-02-16 16:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
Katsumi Yamaoka <yamaoka@jpl.org> writes:
> Hm, it works for me. What I did for the trial is:
>
> Make two of forwarded articles in the nnml group.
> Mark those articles by #.
> Type X m message/rfc822 RET /tmp/ RET.
That...
> Remove two of saved files.
> Go to the first article in the summary buffer.
> Type 2 X m message/rfc822 RET /tmp/ RET.
...nor that work for me. Gnus just ends up on the last
article marked (looking like I hit C-u g) and no files are
written.
The first time I was doing it from an nnimap mailstore, but I
`B c'-ed the messages to an nnml group and experienced the
same behavior.
Glad it works for you though. ;-)
--
aaraines@pobox.com (Andrew A. Raines)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-02-16 16:04 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-02-15 16:46 No process-mark for gnus-summary-save-parts? Andrew Raines
2005-02-16 4:03 ` Katsumi Yamaoka
2005-02-16 16:04 ` Andrew Raines
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).