From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/78472 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Riley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: read new mail while in another group Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 18:09:10 +0200 Organization: aich tea tea pea dicky riley dot net Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1302625252 24748 80.91.229.12 (12 Apr 2011 16:20:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 16:20:52 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M26775@lists.math.uh.edu Tue Apr 12 18:20:49 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q9gKe-0000ST-FY for ding-account@gmane.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 18:20:48 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Q9gKJ-00035x-7N; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 11:20:27 -0500 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Q9gKH-00035M-Ru for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 11:20:25 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Q9gK3-0007LE-Qt for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 11:20:15 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Q9gK2-0006OE-GP for ding@gnus.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 18:20:10 +0200 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q9gK1-0008TN-TF for ding@gnus.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 18:20:09 +0200 Original-Received: from 85.183.18.158 ([85.183.18.158]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 18:20:09 +0200 Original-Received: from rileyrg by 85.183.18.158 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 18:20:09 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 18 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 85.183.18.158 User-Agent: Gnus/5.110016 (No Gnus v0.16) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:tYTm8uwoFdJls2T9gvqEabDeZ/Q= X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin (3.3.1 2010-03-16) analysis follows Bayesian score: 0.0000 Ham tokens: 0.000-1624--5627h-0s--0d--H*UA:Emacs, 0.000-1484--5142h-0s--0d--H*u:Emacs, 0.000-1414--4901h-0s--0d--H*UA:Gnus, 0.000-1414--4900h-0s--0d--H*u:Gnus, 0.000-1361--4716h-0s--0d--H*u:linux Spam tokens: 0.880-1243--3664h-42721s--0d--HX-Spam-Relays-External:quimby.gnus.org, 0.880-1243--3664h-42721s--0d--H*RU:quimby.gnus.org, 0.873-959--3842h-41797s--0d--HTo:D*gnus.org, 0.862-616--4429h-43917s--0d--HX-Spam-Relays-Internal:quimby.gnus.org, 0.862-616--4429h-43917s--0d--H*RT:80.91.231.51 Autolearn status: no 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is freemail (rileyrg[at]googlemail.com) 0.0 DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED No valid author signature, adsp_override is CUSTOM_MED -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 1.2 RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO Received: contains an IP address used for HELO -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.9 NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED ADSP custom_med hit, and not from a mailing list 0.0 T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:78472 Archived-At: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: > Richard Riley writes: > >> I guess I was hinting at something more user >> orientated like the ability to hot key to new incoming mail possibly >> something level orientated as hinted at in the op. e.g open a buffer >> from wherever I am, using a hot key, containing all unread mail in level >> 2 groups (auto polling that level for new mail of course) for example or >> for a certain topic. > > So you want a new group that would contain all your unread mail? > > I don't really think that fits with the Gnus model. Not necessarily, just a way for Gnus to *fetch* the next unread mail without need to explicitly find the groups where new mail exists.