From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/64613 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Ugly In-Reply-To? Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 11:27:20 +0900 Organization: NEC Electronics Message-ID: References: <871whsn6dz.fsf@mocca.josefsson.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-2022-jp X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1178764088 8738 80.91.229.12 (10 May 2007 02:28:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 02:28:08 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M13124@lists.math.uh.edu Thu May 10 04:28:07 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HlyNz-0004jW-N3 for ding-account@gmane.org; Thu, 10 May 2007 04:28:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HlyNR-0007Qr-Pj; Wed, 09 May 2007 21:27:33 -0500 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HlyNQ-0007Qc-3G for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 09 May 2007 21:27:32 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HlyNP-0002hh-1K for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 09 May 2007 21:27:32 -0500 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1HlyNN-0003oB-00 for ; Thu, 10 May 2007 04:27:29 +0200 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HlyNN-0002IL-FR for ding@gnus.org; Thu, 10 May 2007 04:27:29 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 10 May 2007 04:27:29 +0200 Original-Received: from miles.bader by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 10 May 2007 04:27:29 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 12 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: fencepost.gnu.org System-Type: i686-pc-linux-gnu Blat: Foop Cancel-Lock: sha1:b3zsG/tnyFai9Nyj3UEuvQwNDSA= X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:64613 Archived-At: Katsumi Yamaoka writes: > BTW, I'm not sure how the In-Reply-To header is actually used. > If anything, I consider it is a useless header, so I've never > been adding it to outgoing messages for years. I've always assumed that some mail clients might use In-Reply-To instead of References for constructing thread trees (though I have no actual evidence one way or the other). -miles -- 自らを空にして、心を開く時、道は開かれる