From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/64396 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: report-emacs-bug and *mail* buffer. Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 15:40:26 +0900 Organization: NEC Electronics Message-ID: References: <87mz2pt92d.fsf@lrde.org> <87fy8bsxtp.fsf@lrde.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1173681672 14620 80.91.229.12 (12 Mar 2007 06:41:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 06:41:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 12 07:41:06 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HQeDR-0006wg-DZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2007 07:41:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HQeE3-0000It-KZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2007 01:41:43 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HQeDs-0000IK-QI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2007 02:41:32 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HQeDo-0000Hc-TO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2007 02:41:31 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HQeDo-0000HZ-OW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2007 01:41:28 -0500 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HQeDA-0001aM-Dq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2007 02:40:48 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HQeD0-0006er-6y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2007 07:40:38 +0100 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2007 07:40:38 +0100 Original-Received: from miles.bader by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2007 07:40:38 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 11 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: fencepost.gnu.org System-Type: i686-pc-linux-gnu Blat: Foop Cancel-Lock: sha1:68+O8qJIq7l3VfxjLdyU4ImOvRs= X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:67772 gmane.emacs.gnus.general:64396 Archived-At: Katsumi Yamaoka writes: > For CONTINUE, it is hard to me to imagine the situation where I want > to use an existing *mail* buffer in order to compose a new mail. I dunno, it seems perfectly reasonable to have a "continue composing mail" command which would jump to the latest unsent message or whatever. -Miles -- We live, as we dream -- alone....