From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/58823 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: [rmail-mbox-branch]: mail-utils Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 11:09:11 +0900 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <87mzywyeau.fsf@oak.pohoyda.family> <20041008234741.GA17298@fencepost> <878yafj2tn.fsf@oak.pohoyda.family> <87mzyvrc4z.fsf@oak.pohoyda.family> <20041009182047.GA22402@fencepost> <878yaf61x0.fsf@oak.pohoyda.family> <20041009211043.GA8161@fencepost> <20041009211907.GC8161@fencepost> <20041010225828.GA31829@fencepost> Reply-To: Miles Bader NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1097547024 28965 80.91.229.6 (12 Oct 2004 02:10:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 02:10:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org, alexander.pohoyda@gmx.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 12 04:10:12 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CHC79-0003sy-00 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 04:10:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CHCE6-0005XL-9O for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 22:17:22 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CHCDw-0005X5-QT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 22:17:12 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CHCDv-0005WY-R5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 22:17:12 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CHCDv-0005WO-Od for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 22:17:11 -0400 Original-Received: from [202.32.8.202] (helo=tyo202.gate.nec.co.jp) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CHC6a-0003tj-9P; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 22:09:36 -0400 Original-Received: from mailgate3.nec.co.jp (mailgate53.nec.co.jp [10.7.69.162] (may be forged)) by tyo202.gate.nec.co.jp (8.11.7/3.7W01080315) with ESMTP id i9C29Hn12121; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 11:09:27 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: (from root@localhost) by mailgate3.nec.co.jp (8.11.7/3.7W-MAILGATE-NEC) id i9C29H313274; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 11:09:17 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from edtmg02.lsi.nec.co.jp ([10.26.16.202]) by mailsv.nec.co.jp (8.11.7/3.7W-MAILSV-NEC) with ESMTP id i9C29Fx21644; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 11:09:15 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from mcsss2.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by edtmg02.lsi.nec.co.jp (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i9C29DM5022705; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 11:09:13 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from mctpc71 (mctpc71.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp [10.30.118.121]) by mcsss2.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp (8.12.10/8.12.8/EDcg v2.01-mc/1046780839) with ESMTP id i9C29Cwt016006; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 11:09:12 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: by mctpc71 (Postfix, from userid 31295) id B52E33CB; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 11:09:11 +0900 (JST) Original-To: rms@gnu.org System-Type: i686-pc-linux-gnu Blat: Foop In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Mon, 11 Oct 2004 12:45:43 -0400") Original-Lines: 16 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:28271 gmane.emacs.gnus.general:58823 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:58823 Richard Stallman writes: > Do you mean that a patch from a gnus maintainer would have to be > posted to the mailing list to be put into emacs (unlike Gnus > changes)? > > I mean they should treat these files the same way they treat all the > other Lisp files that are not part of Gnus. That does not mean ALL > changes have to be discussed. They can install local uncontroversial > bug fixes without discussion, just as any of us would. However, > beyond that, they ought to post on this list. Ok, that sounds reasonable, and workable in practice for my Gnus-syncing. -Miles -- If you can't beat them, arrange to have them beaten. [George Carlin]