Re: crash

[Jan Vroonhof <vroonhof@math.ethz.ch>]

Michael Harnois <mdharnois@home.com> writes:

You did say you could reproduce this?

>     > If it is a crash, then it is xemacs and you need to give more
>     > info. C backtrace and version to be precise ('latest cvs' is
>     > very ambiguous)
> #2  0x805608b in xrealloc (block=0x87148b8, size=9600)
>     at /usr/src/xemacs-21.2/src/alloc.c:296

This seems ok.. 

> #3  0x808cd18 in record_unwind_protect (
>     function=0x81145fc <change_function_restore>, arg={gu = {
>         type = Lisp_Type_Record, val = 36618428}, s = {bits = 0, 
>         val = 73236856}, u = {bits = 0, val = 73236856}, ui = 146473712, 
>       i = 146473712, v = 0x8bb02f0, cv = 0x8bb02f0})
>     at /usr/src/xemacs-21.2/src/eval.c:4455
> #4  0x8111039 in signal_before_change (buf=0x8bb02f0, start=1, end=1)
>     at /usr/src/xemacs-21.2/src/insdel.c:2174

Maybe Hrvoje has an idea. Although this is before the extent
modification stuff.

The only thing is that your bracktrace looks very deep. Maybe we are
running out of stackspace somewhere?

Jan