From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/9578
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Jan Vroonhof <vroonhof@math.ethz.ch>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: [Article display mess up] SOLVED! (-> FAQ ???)
Date: 23 Jan 1997 12:42:06 +0100
Sender: vroonhof@math.ethz.ch
Message-ID: <byybdkhb3l.fsf@math.ethz.ch>
References: <yj9afq9591j.fsf@adobe.com> <m220bjkcba.fsf@proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no> <qk2vi8ssphg.fsf@iptsun2.unil.ch> <by915ln7h8.fsf_-_@math.ethz.ch> <m2g1zs4ud4.fsf@proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.94)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035149581 19283 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:33:01 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:33:01 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <ding-request@ifi.uio.no>
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2])
	by deanna.miranova.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id EAA14464
	for <steve@miranova.com>; Thu, 23 Jan 1997 04:00:19 -0800
Original-Received: from frege.math.ethz.ch (root@frege-d-math-north-g-west.math.ethz.ch [129.132.145.3]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <MAA06742@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Thu, 23 Jan 1997 12:42:59 +0100
Original-Received: from fresnel.math.ethz.ch (vroonhof@fresnel [129.132.145.6]) by frege.math.ethz.ch (8.6.12/Main-STAT-mailer) with ESMTP id MAA03894 for <ding@ifi.uio.no>; Thu, 23 Jan 1997 12:41:58 +0100
Original-Received: (vroonhof@localhost) by fresnel.math.ethz.ch (8.6.9/D-MATH-client) id MAA12121; Thu, 23 Jan 1997 12:42:07 +0100
Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no
In-Reply-To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of 23 Jan 1997 10:24:23 +0100
Original-Lines: 19
X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.82/XEmacs 19.14
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9578
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9578

Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@ifi.uio.no> writes:

> > This annotation has a "begin-glyph" property set to the group
> > icon/name. This wouldn't be a problem, BUT the gnus
> > article-fancification code does not expect this and creates
> > annotations/extents itself each one inheriting the begin-glyph
> > property.
> 
> Is there a way to avoid inheriting this begin-glyph?  Could it be
> marked as "non-inheritable" or something?

The best way would be make sure the picon annoation extent never
overlaps the headers as it should be. You could do that by making sure
one inserts the article headers BEFORE the extent.
The easiest way to do this by creating the picon annotations after the
article texts had bin inserted which is why one should put the picon
stuff in article-display-hook.

JAn