From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/64967 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Daiki Ueno Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: pgg-gpg doesn't work at all [fix included] Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 09:43:14 +0900 Message-ID: References: <06937cc5-86bc-4c13-9779-5b1acab5cc6d@well-done.deisui.org> <876448f20z.fsf@catnip.gol.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1185410619 30488 80.91.229.12 (26 Jul 2007 00:43:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:43:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org To: Miles Bader Original-X-From: ding-owner+M13477@lists.math.uh.edu Thu Jul 26 02:43:36 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IDrS3-0001MM-BM for ding-account@gmane.org; Thu, 26 Jul 2007 02:43:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1IDrRr-0003cQ-NA; Wed, 25 Jul 2007 19:43:23 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1IDrRp-0003c0-Lh for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 25 Jul 2007 19:43:21 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IDrRo-0004Nu-Ge for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 25 Jul 2007 19:43:21 -0500 Original-Received: from 221x255x76x220.ap221.ftth.ucom.ne.jp ([221.255.76.220] helo=localhost ident=Debian-exim) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1IDrRn-0004NL-00 for ; Thu, 26 Jul 2007 02:43:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=well-done.deisui.org ident=ueno) by localhost with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IDrRj-0001h6-0h; Thu, 26 Jul 2007 09:43:15 +0900 X-Attribution: DU Mail-Copies-To: poster In-Reply-To: <876448f20z.fsf@catnip.gol.com> (Miles Bader's message of "Thu, 26 Jul 2007 09:21:16 +0900") X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:64967 Archived-At: >>>>> In <876448f20z.fsf@catnip.gol.com> >>>>> Miles Bader wrote: > Leo writes: > >> Alternatively, this can be fixed by reverting No Gnus' PGG to GNU Emacs > >> 22's, as I suggested to Miles Bader some time ago. However, I > >> personally don't have a big motivation to do that, since I'm sure that > >> once a user switches from PGG to EasyPG, s/he won't want to go back. > > > > So the problem is to get EasyPG into Emacs. > Or revert PGG, which may be easier in the short term (it doesn't require > any change in Emacs). > I basically don't care which is done, but I wish one of main Gnus > hackers would give their opinion. Who do you expect by "one of main Gnus hackers"? I don't know anyone else who follows the recent PGP related changes. > I don't feel qualified to say which way is best (_in the short term_ > -- it seems likely that EPG will be merged into Emacs in the long > term). I'm now contacting other developers of EPG. The latter way might be happen sooner. Regards, -- Daiki Ueno