From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/73280 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Riley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: $ collision Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 02:49:37 +0200 Organization: aich tea tea pea dicky riley dot net Message-ID: References: <87pqv779gi.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> <87ocarvxt8.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1287449392 6319 80.91.229.12 (19 Oct 2010 00:49:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 00:49:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org To: Russ Allbery Original-X-From: ding-owner+M21652@lists.math.uh.edu Tue Oct 19 02:49:51 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P80Ok-0000OL-QS for ding-account@gmane.org; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 02:49:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1P80Oe-0002SW-AL; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 19:49:44 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1P80Oc-0002SG-SM for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 19:49:42 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1P80Ob-0007EF-AP for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 19:49:42 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-bw0-f44.google.com ([209.85.214.44]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1P80Oa-0000lr-00 for ; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 02:49:40 +0200 Original-Received: by bwz14 with SMTP id 14so1221610bwz.17 for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 17:49:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:cc:subject :organization:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent :mime-version:content-type; bh=j4U1F/vUG/35ffwQSgr1h1XctXq0wA7py16JIyCiVQM=; b=Bnk+xr8Hd9J6eLBXgPzGtPrrvQ6ifkCs5gwtI7XzRyTo8hRW6z5Zd9dMqPGlPbI1xK mPgo/NcoXBdnE0LjrHKGYq2caqu33AtTeS3Zagf/PHtOseT8jfg6CF/1HlEnOh8/zt+8 i3/IMNlOpC3biuHuXT+Cxjxn+PJ5dcc50gPUs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:organization:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; b=L3s1sD+rMVDlNwH1j5sIw4rqdKi2M9X6I/gYzioFfIcHtzGWvlfWJ0S3vWWjAkotnP xTdrKvPNIXEh3BtLBFToArq7ZmDeYerBR5PMhJ/0BPiVB9ctXXWvcR4Jqaf87tZZGII/ HJYidXZMW/7F/CQYEVtG7HKAJJOujn3itwxhM= Original-Received: by 10.204.115.210 with SMTP id j18mr4912425bkq.69.1287449379717; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 17:49:39 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost ([85.183.18.158]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p34sm15291156bkf.15.2010.10.18.17.49.38 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 18 Oct 2010 17:49:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87ocarvxt8.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> (Russ Allbery's message of "Mon, 18 Oct 2010 17:19:31 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:73280 Archived-At: Russ Allbery writes: > Richard Riley writes: > >> keyboard dependant I guess. $ is a shifted key for me and M-d seems >> pretty instantaneous for someone using and familiar emacs. > > I don't believe it's keyboard-dependent, but I could be wrong. I've never > had meta survive ssh -> xterm -> emacs, which forces two keystrokes (ESC > d) instead of one shifted keystroke. It's quite a bit slower when marking > multiple messages. Maybe I'm missing something but M- works fine. In this case M-d. M not working would render emacs useless in a terminal I would have thought. Possibly I get better results because its urxvt in tmux? I dont recall M-d causing any issues in any other setups - I did have issues with functions keys however! I tried getting me head around termcap etc but, well, chickened out... Still, if $ is popular then grand ;) I just wonder why set another key where there is already another incumbent. Leave it to the individual. Also the spam handling can be set for different marks on a per group basis I believe. Not that I ever tried it. ,---- | [ ] Spam mark choices: | Set: | [ ] gnus-spam-mark | Mark used for spam articles. | [ ] gnus-killed-mark | Mark used for killed articles. | [ ] gnus-kill-file-mark | Mark used for articles killed by kill files. | [ ] gnus-low-score-mark | Mark used for articles with a low score. | Marks considered spam. [Hide Rest] | Such articles will be processed as spam on group exit. When nil, the global | spam-spam-marks variable takes precedence. `---- So a kill could also result in spam processing. best regards r.