Re: Bug in summary buffer line?

[Frank Schmitt <usereplyto@Frank-Schmitt.net>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 370 bytes --]

Niklas Morberg <niklas.morberg@axis.com> writes:

>When looking at mails older than one month, the
>`&user-date;' seems to get confused; instead of displaying
>the date, the number of the month is displayed instead. The
>incorrect result is this (copied from my summary buffer):
>
>?* okt 10 '01 [   0 Majordomo@hpc.uh.edu] Welcome to ding

Confirmed. here is the fix:


[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #2: Fix typo --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 644 bytes --]

--- gnus-util.el.old	Sun Jan  6 15:33:04 2002
+++ gnus-util.el	Tue Jan 15 15:02:32 2002
@@ -343,7 +343,7 @@
     (604800 . "%a %k:%M")                   ;;that's one week
     ((gnus-seconds-month) . "%a %d")
     ((gnus-seconds-year) . "%b %d")
-    (t . "%b %m '%y"))                      ;;this one is used when no other does match
+    (t . "%b %d '%y"))                      ;;this one is used when no other does match
   "Alist of time in seconds and format specification used to display dates not older.
 The first element must be a number or a function returning a
 number. The second element is a format-specification as described in


[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 175 bytes --]

-- 
One Ring to rule them all, One Ring to find them,
One Ring to bring them all and in the darkness bind them
In the Land of Mordor where the Shadows lie.
19. Dezember 2001