* Gnus Supression: gnus-dup.el too aggressive?
@ 1996-09-13 18:55 Raja R Harinath
1996-09-18 1:04 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Raja R Harinath @ 1996-09-13 18:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
Hi,
I have `gnus-supress-duplicates', and `gnus-save-duplicates-list'. The
problem is that it supresses articles in most nndoc generated digests
group (C-d). I figured out why: Gnus allots a emacs-session-time unique
id to each message without an id, "none+nnn". This ID gets saved in the
duplicates list across Emacsen and wrongly supresses most of newly
generated temporary articles.
This has to be fixed. But how:
- should `gnus-dup' know about these message-ids, and ignore them. And,
which regexp to use: "\`none\+[^@]*\'" looks nice, is correct for mail
and "almost" correct for news.
- should Gnus maintain a dont-bother-saving list of message-ids. Looks
too heavyweight to me.
By the way, in `gnus-dup-enter-articles', message-ids should probably be
checked if already in the list (intern-soft message-id gnus-dup-hashtb)
before entering into the `gnus-dup-list'. This prevents duplicates in
the duplicates list.
- Hari
--
Raja R Harinath ------------------------------ harinath@cs.umn.edu
"When all else fails, read the instructions." -- Cahn's Axiom
"Our policy is, when in doubt, do the right thing." -- Roy L Ash
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Gnus Supression: gnus-dup.el too aggressive?
1996-09-13 18:55 Gnus Supression: gnus-dup.el too aggressive? Raja R Harinath
@ 1996-09-18 1:04 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen @ 1996-09-18 1:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: ding
Raja R Harinath <harinath@cs.umn.edu> writes:
> I have `gnus-supress-duplicates', and `gnus-save-duplicates-list'. The
> problem is that it supresses articles in most nndoc generated digests
> group (C-d). I figured out why: Gnus allots a emacs-session-time unique
> id to each message without an id, "none+nnn". This ID gets saved in the
> duplicates list across Emacsen and wrongly supresses most of newly
> generated temporary articles.
Right. I think nndoc should create better Message-IDs. I've put this
on the Red Gnus todo list.
> By the way, in `gnus-dup-enter-articles', message-ids should probably be
> checked if already in the list (intern-soft message-id gnus-dup-hashtb)
> before entering into the `gnus-dup-list'. This prevents duplicates in
> the duplicates list.
:-) Fix in Red Gnus v0.38.
--
"Yes. The journey through the human heart
would have to wait until some other time."
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~1996-09-18 1:04 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
1996-09-13 18:55 Gnus Supression: gnus-dup.el too aggressive? Raja R Harinath
1996-09-18 1:04 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).