From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/7879 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Raja R Harinath Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Gnus Supression: gnus-dup.el too aggressive? Date: 13 Sep 1996 13:55:59 -0500 Sender: harinath@cs.umn.edu Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.68) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035148130 8833 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:08:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:08:50 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id MAA23050 for ; Fri, 13 Sep 1996 12:27:37 -0700 Original-Received: from mail.cs.umn.edu (mail.cs.umn.edu [128.101.149.1]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Fri, 13 Sep 1996 20:56:15 +0200 Original-Received: from nebula.cs.umn.edu (harinath@nebula.cs.umn.edu [128.101.228.2]) by mail.cs.umn.edu (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id NAA13844 for ; Fri, 13 Sep 1996 13:56:10 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: (harinath@localhost) by nebula.cs.umn.edu (8.6.12/8.6.12) id NAA26088; Fri, 13 Sep 1996 13:56:04 -0500 Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no Original-Lines: 29 X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.33/Emacs 19.34 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:7879 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:7879 Hi, I have `gnus-supress-duplicates', and `gnus-save-duplicates-list'. The problem is that it supresses articles in most nndoc generated digests group (C-d). I figured out why: Gnus allots a emacs-session-time unique id to each message without an id, "none+nnn". This ID gets saved in the duplicates list across Emacsen and wrongly supresses most of newly generated temporary articles. This has to be fixed. But how: - should `gnus-dup' know about these message-ids, and ignore them. And, which regexp to use: "\`none\+[^@]*\'" looks nice, is correct for mail and "almost" correct for news. - should Gnus maintain a dont-bother-saving list of message-ids. Looks too heavyweight to me. By the way, in `gnus-dup-enter-articles', message-ids should probably be checked if already in the list (intern-soft message-id gnus-dup-hashtb) before entering into the `gnus-dup-list'. This prevents duplicates in the duplicates list. - Hari -- Raja R Harinath ------------------------------ harinath@cs.umn.edu "When all else fails, read the instructions." -- Cahn's Axiom "Our policy is, when in doubt, do the right thing." -- Roy L Ash