What happened to all.SCORE?

What happened to all.SCORE?

[Thomas Skogestad]

5.8.7 loves it, while 5.8.8 and Oort just ignores it.

-- 
thomas.skogestad@jusstud.uio.no
http://quimby.gnus.org/circus/problem.gif
http://www.messengers-of-messiah.org/~csebold/emacs/why.phtml

Re: What happened to Xref scoring? (was all.SCORE?)

[Thomas Skogestad]

* Thomas Skogestad

| 5.8.7 loves it, while 5.8.8 and Oort just ignores it.

(Bzzt! Wrong!) not a problem with all.SCORE, but...

The error however seems to be parsing of the Xref header. Does not seem to
work in newer Gnusae.

Now I must see all of this massively cross-posted spam junk.

And why does the CVS Oort force you to obey the followup-to header? I want
some control over where I post.

-- 
thomas.skogestad@jusstud.uio.no
http://quimby.gnus.org/circus/problem.gif
http://www.messengers-of-messiah.org/~csebold/emacs/why.phtml

Re: What happened to Xref scoring? (was all.SCORE?)

[Paul Jarc]

Thomas Skogestad <tskogest@jusstud.uio.no> writes:
> And why does the CVS Oort force you to obey the followup-to header? I want
> some control over where I post.

(setq message-use-followup-to t)
I think ShengHuo changed the default for the sake of Mail-Followup-To,
but MFT really ought to have a separate configuration variable.


paul

Re: What happened to Xref scoring? (was all.SCORE?)

[Paul Jarc]

I wrote:
> Thomas Skogestad <tskogest@jusstud.uio.no> writes:
> > And why does the CVS Oort force you to obey the followup-to header? I want
> > some control over where I post.
> 
> (setq message-use-followup-to t)

Oops - you probably want 'ask, not t.


paul

Re: What happened to Xref scoring? (was all.SCORE?)

[Steve Youngs]

|--==> "TS" == Thomas Skogestad <tskogest@jusstud.uio.no> writes:

  TS> And why does the CVS Oort force you to obey the followup-to header? I want
  TS> some control over where I post.

Although control over what you do is a good thing, why do you want to
ignore your reader's wishes?

-- 
|---<Steve Youngs>---------------<GnuPG KeyID: 9E7E2820>---|
|            XEmacs - It's not just an editor.             |
|                    It's a way of life.                   |
|------------------------------------<youngs@xemacs.org>---|

Re: What happened to Xref scoring? (was all.SCORE?)

[Thomas Skogestad]

* Steve Youngs

| Although control over what you do is a good thing, why do you want to
| ignore your reader's wishes?

Whatever the reader wishes is irrelevant. I'll post where my articles
belong.

-- 
thomas.skogestad@jusstud.uio.no
http://quimby.gnus.org/circus/problem.gif
http://www.messengers-of-messiah.org/~csebold/emacs/why.phtml

Re: What happened to Xref scoring? (was all.SCORE?)

[Robin S. Socha]

* Steve Youngs <youngs@xemacs.org> writes:
> Thomas Skogestad <tskogest@jusstud.uio.no> writes:

>>  And why does the CVS Oort force you to obey the followup-to header?
>>  I want some control over where I post.

> Although control over what you do is a good thing, why do you want to
> ignore your reader's wishes?

Reader? How about "boys trying to be men" aka MCSEs running mailing lists?
-- 
Robin S. Socha  <http://my.gnus.org/users/robin/>
http://my.gnus.org/ - To boldly frobnicate what no newbie has grokked before.

Re: What happened to Xref scoring? (was all.SCORE?)

[Steve Youngs]

|--==> "TS" == Thomas Skogestad <tskogest@jusstud.uio.no> writes:

  TS> Whatever the reader wishes is irrelevant.

Hmm, I wonder if that's what the authors of bulk email spam programs
think? 

-- 
|---<Steve Youngs>---------------<GnuPG KeyID: 9E7E2820>---|
|            XEmacs - It's not just an editor.             |
|                    It's a way of life.                   |
|------------------------------------<youngs@xemacs.org>---|