From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/30764
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@iskon.hr>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: should mbox be opened in unibyte mode
Date: 06 May 2000 20:55:45 +0200
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <dp8zxncxu6.fsf@mraz.iskon.hr>
References: <20000505054215.7031.qmail@duch.mimuw.edu.pl>
	<00May5.113140edt.115221@gateway.intersys.com>
	<dp1z3hdkal.fsf@mraz.iskon.hr> <2ng0rxvsnb.fsf@tiger.jia.vnet>
	<dpem7gdikf.fsf@mraz.iskon.hr>
	<200005051746.TAA08033@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035167254 10201 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 02:27:34 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 02:27:34 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: ding@gnus.org
Return-Path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from lisa.math.uh.edu (lisa.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.49])
	by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7E55D051E
	for <jason@mailhost.sclp.com>; Sat,  6 May 2000 14:58:43 -0400 (EDT)
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5])
	by lisa.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAB30746;
	Sat, 6 May 2000 13:58:41 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sat, 06 May 2000 13:57:09 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from mailhost.sclp.com (postfix@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139])
	by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA05074
	for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Sat, 6 May 2000 13:56:59 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from mraz.iskon.hr (mraz.iskon.hr [195.29.170.8])
	by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A614ED051E
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Sat,  6 May 2000 14:55:56 -0400 (EDT)
Original-Received: (from hniksic@localhost)
	by mraz.iskon.hr (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) id UAA21728;
	Sat, 6 May 2000 20:55:47 +0200
X-Authentication-Warning: mraz.iskon.hr: hniksic set sender to hniksic@iskon.hr using -f
Original-To: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=)
X-Attribution: Hrvoje
X-Face: &{dT~)Pu6V<0y?>3p$;@vh\`C7xB~A0T-J%Og)J,@-1%q6Q+,
        gs<-9M#&`I8cJp2b1{vPE|~+JE+gx;a7%BG{}nY^ehK1"q#rG
        O,Rn1A_Cy%t]V=Brv7h<L@)<XGh#XroV6xQg$VA8K
In-Reply-To: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE's message of "Fri, 5 May 2000 19:46:53 +0200"
Original-Lines: 11
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0806 (Gnus v5.8.6) XEmacs/21.2 (Kastor & Polydeukes)
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:30764
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:30764

Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai Gro=DFjohann) writes:

> Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@iskon.hr> writes:
>=20
> > How can one name be "right"?=20=20
>=20
> By working on both Emacsen, for example.

Oh, I see.  You're of course correct -- in that sense, `binary' and
`raw-text' are the right (accepted in both implementations) names for
those features.