From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/31006 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hrvoje Niksic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Improved (non-annoying) underlining Date: 17 May 2000 14:26:09 +0200 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035167466 11623 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 02:31:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 02:31:06 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from lisa.math.uh.edu (lisa.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.49]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31D00D0520 for ; Wed, 17 May 2000 08:26:43 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by lisa.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id HAB06246; Wed, 17 May 2000 07:26:38 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Wed, 17 May 2000 07:26:04 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from mailhost.sclp.com (postfix@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA27081 for ; Wed, 17 May 2000 07:25:54 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from mraz.iskon.hr (mraz.iskon.hr [195.29.170.8]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2971BD0520 for ; Wed, 17 May 2000 08:26:14 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: (from hniksic@localhost) by mraz.iskon.hr (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) id OAA31660; Wed, 17 May 2000 14:26:09 +0200 X-Authentication-Warning: mraz.iskon.hr: hniksic set sender to hniksic@iskon.hr using -f Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Attribution: Hrvoje X-Face: &{dT~)Pu6V<0y?>3p$;@vh\`C7xB~A0T-J%Og)J,@-1%q6Q+, gs<-9M#&`I8cJp2b1{vPE|~+JE+gx;a7%BG{}nY^ehK1"q#rG O,Rn1A_Cy%t]V=Brv7h writes: > You can customize `gnus-emphasis-alist'. The problem with gnus-emphasis-alist, as well as many other parts of Gnus, is over-reliance on regexps. There is a limit to what regexps can do, and gnus-emphasis-alist is damn near hitting it. I've been dreaming about ways to define a nicer (more Lispy) language to define heuristics, that deals with tokens such as "words" and "sentences" rather than individual characters. Making such a beast usable, elegant, and fast is a highly non-trivial task.