From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/28997 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Oyvind Moll Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Oort Gnus Date: 30 Jan 2000 03:20:59 +0100 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035165743 32698 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 02:02:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 02:02:23 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from bart.math.uh.edu (bart.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.48]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECB5DD051E for ; Sat, 29 Jan 2000 21:22:58 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by bart.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id UAB32278; Sat, 29 Jan 2000 20:21:33 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sat, 29 Jan 2000 20:21:19 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from mailhost.sclp.com (postfix@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA24341 for ; Sat, 29 Jan 2000 20:21:07 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from apollo.orakel.ntnu.no (apollo.orakel.ntnu.no [129.241.56.245]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 5F8EBD051E for ; Sat, 29 Jan 2000 21:21:01 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (qmail 16424 invoked by uid 28778); 30 Jan 2000 02:20:59 -0000 Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Original-Lines: 20 User-Agent: Gnus/5.070097 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.97) Emacs/20.3 Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:28997 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:28997 * Alan Shutko | | Matt Simmons writes: | | > How about a fast replacement for nnml? | | Yikes, and nnml was supposed to be a fast replacement for everything | else. Any ideas on how it would work? Keep all messages, regardless of folder, in a shared hashed directory hierarchy, and let all the groups/folders just be references to subsets of these messages? Oh what do I know -- I'm way too drunk at the moment to make sense. -- Øyvind Møll oyvindmo@initio.no http://www.initio.no/ vi(1) gjør Norge billigere.