From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/34806 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: NAGY Andras Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: mail-{followup,copies}-to on this list Date: 15 Feb 2001 14:56:23 +0100 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <87d7clvvth.fsf@lovi.inf.elte.hu> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035170660 32187 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:24:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:24:20 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from karazm.math.uh.edu (karazm.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.1]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70218D049D for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 08:57:24 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by karazm.math.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAC08760; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 07:56:44 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Thu, 15 Feb 2001 07:56:07 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from mailhost.sclp.com (postfix@66-209.196.61.interliant.com [209.196.61.66] (may be forged)) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA13741 for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 07:55:58 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from mail.inf.elte.hu (mail.inf.elte.hu [157.181.161.6]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76179D049D for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 08:56:26 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: by mail.inf.elte.hu (Postfix, from userid 28535) id 5CAC28011; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 14:56:23 +0100 (NFT) Original-To: ding@gnus.org Mail-Copies-To: nobody User-Agent: Gnus/5.090001 (Oort Gnus v0.01) XEmacs/21.1 (Biscayne) Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Original-Lines: 11 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:34806 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:34806 Okay, you convinced me. I've chosen the mail-copies-to header. Per Abrahamsen writes: > 4. He can try flaming on the list, and hope the receivers will make it > their problem. I strongly discourage selecting this option. Sorry for this. Andras