From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/34851
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: NAGY Andras <nagya@inf.elte.hu>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: another gnus-boring-article-headers suggestion
Date: 19 Feb 2001 18:21:06 +0100
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <dzcwvam4mil.fsf@pandora.inf.elte.hu>
References: <8766jfi8eu.fsf@lovi.inf.elte.hu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035170697 32405 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:24:57 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:24:57 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from karazm.math.uh.edu (karazm.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.1])
	by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA114D049E
	for <jason@mastaler.com>; Mon, 19 Feb 2001 12:22:09 -0500 (EST)
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5])
	by karazm.math.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAC17560;
	Mon, 19 Feb 2001 11:21:45 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Mon, 19 Feb 2001 11:20:46 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: from mailhost.sclp.com (postfix@66-209.196.61.interliant.com [209.196.61.66] (may be forged))
	by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA11556
	for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Mon, 19 Feb 2001 11:20:37 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: from mail.inf.elte.hu (mail.inf.elte.hu [157.181.161.6])
	by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C64DFD049E
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Mon, 19 Feb 2001 12:21:07 -0500 (EST)
Original-Received: by mail.inf.elte.hu (Postfix, from userid 28535)
	id 4E6A980BD; Mon, 19 Feb 2001 18:21:07 +0100 (CET)
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
In-Reply-To: <8766jfi8eu.fsf@lovi.inf.elte.hu> (NAGY Andras's message of "16 Jan 2001 20:50:01 +0100")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090001 (Oort Gnus v0.01) XEmacs/21.1 (Biscayne)
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Original-Lines: 15
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:34851
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:34851

We have `reply-to' as a possible value in
gnus-boring-article-headers.  What about a `broken-reply-to' option,
which would hide the Reply-To header if

(version A) the group has a broken-reply-to paramter set.

(version B) the address in the Reply-To field is identical to the
groups' to-address (to-list?) parameter.

(version C) conditions in A and B are met.




Andras