From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/33851 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: vvv@vsu.ru Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: 8bit mails via POP mail-source Date: 22 Dec 2000 12:05:01 +0300 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035169880 27284 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:11:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:11:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-pretesters@gnu.org, ding@gnus.org Return-Path: Original-Received: from spinoza.math.uh.edu (spinoza.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.18]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5935CD049D for ; Fri, 22 Dec 2000 04:05:41 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by spinoza.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id DAB29956; Fri, 22 Dec 2000 03:05:31 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Fri, 22 Dec 2000 03:04:47 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from mailhost.sclp.com (postfix@66-209.196.61.interliant.com [209.196.61.66] (may be forged)) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA19410 for ; Fri, 22 Dec 2000 03:04:34 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from vsu.ru (relay1.vsu.ru [62.76.169.14]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EF41D049D for ; Fri, 22 Dec 2000 04:04:58 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from video.uic.vsu.ru ([62.76.169.38] verified) by vsu.ru (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4b7) with ESMTP id 2230468; Fri, 22 Dec 2000 12:05:02 +0300 Original-To: Dave Love In-Reply-To: Original-Lines: 22 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.6 Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:33851 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:33851 "DL" == Dave Love writes: vvv> I've attached a mail digest from the gnus mailing list which vvv> describes the problem. In particular, see the message from vvv> ratinox@peorth.gweep.net with Message-ID vvv> . DL> Note that Pieri is wrong about the fix. Please also disregard DL> his rants about maintenance. well, could you please explain in more details why Pieri is wrong about the fix? the current pop3.el behaves buggy. it asks annoying and nonsence questions when receiving mail via POP3. the original pop3.el by Pieri does not have such broken behavior. if you find Pieri's arguments wrong, then please fix pop3.el as you think it is correct. but current pop3.el is broken. Best, v.