From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/33392 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Vladimir Volovich Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: someone broke message-newline-and-reformat Date: 17 Nov 2000 14:42:58 +0300 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035169509 24918 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:05:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:05:09 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from spinoza.math.uh.edu (spinoza.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.18]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC8F6D049A for ; Fri, 17 Nov 2000 06:44:47 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by spinoza.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id FAB10032; Fri, 17 Nov 2000 05:44:40 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Fri, 17 Nov 2000 05:42:15 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from mailhost.sclp.com (postfix@66-209.196.61.interliant.com [209.196.61.66] (may be forged)) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id FAA21751 for ; Fri, 17 Nov 2000 05:42:04 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from vsu.ru (relay1.vsu.ru [62.76.169.14]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 675F0D049A for ; Fri, 17 Nov 2000 06:42:27 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from video.uic.vsu.ru ([62.76.169.38] verified) by vsu.ru (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4b4) with ESMTP id 2054529 for ding@gnus.org; Fri, 17 Nov 2000 14:42:52 +0300 Original-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 15 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.6 Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:33392 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:33392 Hi, message-newline-and-reformat still behaves not good: it removes any spaces betseen attribution and cited text after reciting. well, is it really that hard to fix message-newline-and-reformat once and for all? :-) if you cannot make the regexp variables sharable between message-newline-and-reformat and other purposes, then just do not share them: i've already posted a regexp for message-newline-and-reformat which works nice. Best, v.