From: Richard Riley <rileyrg@googlemail.com>
To: ding@gnus.org
Subject: Re: That new date header...
Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 15:07:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <faoc6tmctt.fsf@news.eternal-september.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <yb0ei7pw8nh.fsf@dod.no> (Steinar Bang's message of "Thu, 03 Feb 2011 14:27:14 +0100")
Steinar Bang <sb@dod.no> writes:
> Huh...? Is that what the date discussion is about? Adding stuff to the
> summary buffer?
(oversnipping is a curse .. yes, as is no snipping ;)
> I want absolutely no extra clutter in my summary buffer, beyond what is
> there today!
Possibly others dont. Hence Julien's suggestion about a more user
friendly default.
>
> When starting the thread, I was referring to the formatting on the Date
> header in the message buffer.
>
Yes, and it moved on a little as I pointed out the existing well tested
"sent"/"received" formats used in the summary buffer.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-03 14:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-03 7:10 Steinar Bang
2011-02-03 11:53 ` Richard Riley
2011-02-03 12:03 ` Steinar Bang
2011-02-03 12:13 ` Richard Riley
2011-02-03 12:34 ` Julien Danjou
2011-02-03 12:54 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2011-02-03 13:16 ` Richard Riley
2011-02-03 13:24 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2011-02-03 14:05 ` Richard Riley
2011-02-03 13:27 ` Steinar Bang
2011-02-03 13:50 ` Julien Danjou
2011-02-03 14:08 ` Richard Riley
2011-02-03 14:07 ` Richard Riley [this message]
2011-02-03 14:15 ` User date in summary buffer (was: Re: That new date header...) Julien Danjou
2011-02-03 14:19 ` User date in summary buffer Lars Ingebrigtsen
2011-02-03 14:30 ` Richard Riley
2011-02-03 14:41 ` Julien Danjou
2011-02-03 16:26 ` Using &user-date; format spec errors (was: User date in summary buffer) Tassilo Horn
2011-02-03 19:59 ` Using &user-date; format spec errors Eric S Fraga
2011-02-03 20:06 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2011-02-03 20:24 ` Tassilo Horn
2011-02-04 10:22 ` Julien Danjou
2011-02-04 10:46 ` Tassilo Horn
2011-02-04 18:13 ` Daniel Dehennin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=faoc6tmctt.fsf@news.eternal-september.org \
--to=rileyrg@googlemail.com \
--cc=ding@gnus.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).