From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/76277 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Riley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: That new date header... Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 15:07:10 +0100 Organization: aich tea tea pea dicky riley dot net Message-ID: References: <87mxmdy4o5.fsf@dod.no> <43vd11qqqp.fsf@news.eternal-september.org> <87wrlhe0sc.fsf@gnus.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1296742063 31764 80.91.229.12 (3 Feb 2011 14:07:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 14:07:43 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M24629@lists.math.uh.edu Thu Feb 03 15:07:39 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PkzqU-0003s1-NT for ding-account@gmane.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 15:07:39 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PkzqQ-0003So-Gj; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 08:07:34 -0600 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PkzqP-0003Sc-H4 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 08:07:33 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PkzqE-0008Ly-ON for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 08:07:33 -0600 Original-Received: from mail-bw0-f44.google.com ([209.85.214.44]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PkzqD-0001C6-Vq for ding@gnus.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 15:07:22 +0100 Original-Received: by bwz12 with SMTP id 12so1659002bwz.17 for ; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 06:07:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:date:organization :message-id:references:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=BS7ku2h5ZPsXj+/gXaF5HmYKeAein2XoMS6hfxJxCrg=; b=g17K3bZaXRMCyb4qnIPC06vhgsVCOkaF4WqTszhKEvtr+yEyYzRMMNmI3QU6beeOhp 9aqwuxVzdCUL5HOAQjECaN4XcvqTeBo96gNTWwpPPf5AoT3/QwBL+W5zoqrTeNIoEoo3 VVvxZhmUs5xUGONRu4tCnsMSrgEBe+MAgIEo0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:date:organization:message-id:references :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; b=aP1OyH+vNDQhfKusJxlxwzTg9ynhESvgwapnU7uDFIWBOsFduiCeExoXa6Y3GxE1wa hEHZOasuufWP5P1SIA+VNQNm0Pi27uu2hJXuXFhhtqEn4736zGlE24/lTFTFvFd5HkpK hhihiDlEwj0uSrdsqpvH9iLICuVoqtvGGTf0Y= Original-Received: by 10.204.76.1 with SMTP id a1mr8856014bkk.5.1296742036509; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 06:07:16 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from localhost ([85.183.18.158]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x38sm468586bkj.1.2011.02.03.06.07.14 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 03 Feb 2011 06:07:15 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: (Steinar Bang's message of "Thu, 03 Feb 2011 14:27:14 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Score: -3.0 (---) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:76277 Archived-At: Steinar Bang writes: > Huh...? Is that what the date discussion is about? Adding stuff to the > summary buffer? (oversnipping is a curse .. yes, as is no snipping ;) > I want absolutely no extra clutter in my summary buffer, beyond what is > there today! Possibly others dont. Hence Julien's suggestion about a more user friendly default. > > When starting the thread, I was referring to the formatting on the Date > header in the message buffer. > Yes, and it moved on a little as I pointed out the existing well tested "sent"/"received" formats used in the summary buffer.