From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/60095 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general,gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Changes in calendar/time-date.el Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 18:33:56 +0900 Message-ID: References: <871x9w9dkn.fsf@xs4all.nl> <87mzsezu5f.fsf@xs4all.nl> <87hdimzou0.fsf@xs4all.nl> Reply-To: snogglethorpe@gmail.com, miles@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1112693832 24511 80.91.229.2 (5 Apr 2005 09:37:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 09:37:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Reiner Steib , emacs-devel@gnu.org, ding@gnus.org, Lute Kamstra , Miles Bader Original-X-From: ding-owner+M8622@lists.math.uh.edu Tue Apr 05 11:37:09 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13] ident=mail) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DIkU0-0001lD-Lz for ding-account@gmane.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 11:36:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1DIkRk-00056x-00; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 04:34:08 -0500 Original-Received: from util2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.23]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1DIkRc-00056r-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 04:34:00 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by util2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1DIkRa-0000Oj-QO for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 04:33:58 -0500 Original-Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.205]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1DIkRZ-0004YW-00 for ; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 11:33:58 +0200 Original-Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 49so52797wri for ; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 02:33:57 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=N07Tb7gKrbAc4IGIGdtMRICKSbiyIFN5j2zZby4MS9KrNqSx9FfHydyhRN+sBcp0nb+XPplwPF+o7EXYlDwT4FqIhHLt4QUz5gCv6wNfpIcZSFWz6W9fE0YxT3ElVgYuGCbWV5BLcRC2IW8iJr1y1ZXXToN67Fki955xNs462Sg= Original-Received: by 10.54.59.21 with SMTP id h21mr252451wra; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 02:33:56 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.54.19.32 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 02:33:56 -0700 (PDT) Original-To: "Kim F. Storm" In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -4.9 (----) Precedence: bulk Original-Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:60095 gmane.emacs.devel:35575 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:60095 On Apr 5, 2005 4:14 PM, Kim F. Storm wrote: > >> Can't you move this closer to the definition of message-make-date? > >> It's only necessary to suppress compiler warnings for that function. > > > > I put it inside the defun. > > Doing that will slow down the function, so if that function is used > a lot, I think it is a really bad idea to do so! Er, no it won't. Declaration-only defvars produce no code, whether inside a function or no. -Miles -- Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball.