From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/65103 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Miles Bader" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: etc/refcards/ and new-style backquotes (was: Gnus and GPLv3) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 11:25:33 +0900 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1188440783 11288 80.91.229.12 (30 Aug 2007 02:26:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 02:26:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen" , "Ding List" To: "Reiner Steib" Original-X-From: ding-owner+M13614@lists.math.uh.edu Thu Aug 30 04:26:20 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IQZjf-0005nG-50 for ding-account@gmane.org; Thu, 30 Aug 2007 04:26:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1IQZj1-0007Bo-Ep; Wed, 29 Aug 2007 21:25:39 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1IQZiz-0007BZ-LL for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 29 Aug 2007 21:25:37 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IQZix-0003XE-Cs for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 29 Aug 2007 21:25:37 -0500 Original-Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com ([66.249.82.237]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1IQZiw-0003wR-00 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2007 04:25:34 +0200 Original-Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i30so396973wxd for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2007 19:25:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=ruTSGmLtokncNb33Ro7yDWJmoIwz2CMqno9Gej+hN7Gwy2kfu3+zx+EhB4ojBzJLNViNCNMYVDPTHdZRcKa720n4Lji/zCbAMXZljmetI960KIN9/z9rsLFdIhqAeujpZa+7mI+vPhUkcPq85bo1u87EmBrq4sXoIEk4jfJEzGc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=WFPOiI+CKxLsLcZUGqDyu2Bn0+tkDQ7/XiAFuWNzBc3gkp3CKq55YyAIfPsiLq5TRbXNnmGYWgSjcEJhGTaWF7CvGT+PDAnMIA6CavvZMLZ5Xt03CVXvpFBg0bUbsReR0x772YMZFRHxREdLHcCwT4J98WAs+hGulxutlYklRXo= Original-Received: by 10.90.100.2 with SMTP id x2mr5481agb.1188440733232; Wed, 29 Aug 2007 19:25:33 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.90.105.17 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Aug 2007 19:25:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-Google-Sender-Auth: ce095c15cf47990d X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:65103 Archived-At: On 8/28/07, Reiner Steib wrote: > > and the refcards getting moved into etc/refcards (I don't know if > > this move is desirable for Gnus; if not, then just move them back, > > but if so, I guess the Makefiles etc will need adjusting?). As this > > is the 5.10 branch, people might want to keep an eye out for > > problems. > > Hm, the etc/ reorganization is only in Emacs trunk, isn't it. Did you > sync from Emacs/trunk to Gnus/v5-10? Yeah, though only because this is what I've always done. Now that you mention it, I guess that creates an inadvertent back-channel from the emacs-trunk to the emacs-rel-22 branch, which probably isn't a good thing. [The gnus relevant merges I do are: gnus-5.10 -> emacs-rel-22 emacs-trunk -> gnus-5.10 gnus-5.10 -> gnus-trunk emacs-rel-22 -> emacs-trunk ] So... I suppose that it would be better to only sync changes from the emacs-rel-22 emacs branch to the gnus-5.10 branch? Or alternatively, it could be decided that the gnus-5.10 branch should be linked with the emacs trunk instead of the rel-22 branch. [I _tentatively_ favor the latter, as it's always seemed to me that the changes to the 5.10 branch are sometimes a wee bit aggressive considering it's a release branch.] If it's decided to keep the 5.10 branch associated with the emacs rel-22 branch, I'd favor reverting the changes mentioned previously which aren't on the emacs rel-22 branch. However if that's decided, there will be no merge channel from the emacs trunk to gnus, which is not good I think. In that case, I could start merging from the emacs-trunk to the gnus-trunk ... but with multiple merge channels between emacs and gnus, things are starting to get a bit hairy.... I'm not sure how well it would work out in practice. What do people think? Thanks, -Miles -- Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball.