From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/81213 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Riley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Multi-SMTP Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2012 14:12:40 +0000 Organization: aich tea tea pea dicky riley dot net Message-ID: References: <87k44576et.fsf@gnus.org> <87bopfkhx8.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> Reply-To: ding@gnus.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1328361262 26637 80.91.229.3 (4 Feb 2012 13:14:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2012 13:14:22 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M29494@lists.math.uh.edu Sat Feb 04 14:14:22 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RtfRc-00089D-Qs for ding-account@gmane.org; Sat, 04 Feb 2012 14:14:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1RtfQm-0002qF-Fv; Sat, 04 Feb 2012 07:13:28 -0600 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1RtfQl-0002q4-8I for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sat, 04 Feb 2012 07:13:27 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RtfQg-0002Ee-Gn for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sat, 04 Feb 2012 07:13:26 -0600 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RtfQe-0006P8-Gq for ding@gnus.org; Sat, 04 Feb 2012 14:13:20 +0100 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RtfQc-0007hc-Cf for ding@gnus.org; Sat, 04 Feb 2012 14:13:18 +0100 Original-Received: from 85.183.18.158 ([85.183.18.158]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 04 Feb 2012 14:13:18 +0100 Original-Received: from rileyrg by 85.183.18.158 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 04 Feb 2012 14:13:18 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 24 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 85.183.18.158 Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.93 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:ArW56LgMAxpTH7SoteHvxX+PrAA= X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin (3.3.1 2010-03-16) analysis follows Bayesian score: 0.0000 Ham tokens: 0.000-2012--8682h-0s--0d--H*u:Emacs, 0.000-93--401h-0s--0d--H*u:Gnus, 0.000-87--374h-0s--0d--H*u:linux, 0.000-87--374h-0s--0d--H*UA:linux, 0.000-85--366h-0s--0d--H*u:gnu Spam tokens: 0.927-311--235h-3813s--0d--HX-Spam-Relays-External:quimby.gnus.org, 0.927-311--235h-3813s--0d--H*RU:quimby.gnus.org, 0.925-291--232h-3656s--0d--HTo:D*gnus.org, 0.915-275--286h-3918s--0d--HX-Spam-Relays-Internal:quimby.gnus.org, 0.915-275--286h-3918s--0d--H*RT:80.91.231.51 Autolearn status: no 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rileyrg[at]gmail.com) 0.0 DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED No valid author signature, adsp_override is CUSTOM_MED -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 1.2 RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO Received: contains an IP address used for HELO -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.9 NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED ADSP custom_med hit, and not from a mailing list List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:81213 Archived-At: Eric S Fraga writes: > Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > >> I'm wondering how the multi-SMTP stuff should work. > > [...] > >> On the Gnus side, one could then add "intelligent" rules for determining >> where to send mail, although I'm not sure just how. :-) If the >> Received line of the message you're answering contains smtp.work.com, >> then use that as the outgoing MTA for your work email? Hm... > > No, I would prefer explicit control of what smtp server to use as I > frequently respond to emails that have come into one account as if they > had come into another account (e.g. I receive personal emails on my work > account but would rather carry on the conversation on my personal > email). > > Obviously, as a default in the absence of anything else, what you are > suggesting is fine. I like the idea of setting the smtp to use "token" (machine name in authinfo) using gnus-posting styles. Easy then to set group/from specific.