From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/76192 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Riley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Date header rewrite Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 07:41:08 +0100 Organization: aich tea tea pea dicky riley dot net Message-ID: References: <87pqrdltsq.fsf@gnus.org> <87ei7smujs.fsf@gnus.org> <87tygojys5.fsf@gnus.org> <87r5bsxywf.fsf@gnus.org> <87lj20xxdp.fsf@gnus.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1296542540 14427 80.91.229.12 (1 Feb 2011 06:42:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 06:42:20 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M24544@lists.math.uh.edu Tue Feb 01 07:42:15 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pk9wL-0008GH-AK for ding-account@gmane.org; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 07:42:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Pk9wA-0004n9-Ar; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 00:42:02 -0600 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Pk9w8-0004my-TW for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 00:42:00 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Pk9w4-00055m-DJ for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 00:42:00 -0600 Original-Received: from mail-bw0-f44.google.com ([209.85.214.44]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Pk9w3-0006Sr-JF for ding@gnus.org; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 07:41:55 +0100 Original-Received: by bwz12 with SMTP id 12so6206474bwz.17 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 22:41:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:date:organization :message-id:references:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=LR7/416SiKtKmlhicMASD0vg6m0EOlMnAyEOfYtAC20=; b=pw/f8nDztrN/MT6OslCa9SY9PUXSYkU6zYEAzomKKhlgUoHiWVDJeTOE0nqyu+1Dcw LkW54Z+TxhYuK3utKR9ggprzTSqv0hRNDZsPnc6mOv+cZONSbcHdTjZ8MIG2pUhglmD5 be7yxP0hE3CuEQJfVzDxuxvPP/4AoVPHcf/tM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:date:organization:message-id:references :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; b=n9u7vmt0fIFjN4c6TFapowiZ49GW1A1zKrglRTXai3BzQBXx/Z2jodk6l0UX8tdscw hZQNSpT5/17flL16fD5EsE3IvKvLSmn0Gnj92EqU0UFhotXeSADqSVixuoED0K1Lbtf+ 4FQjwqUR8cPUHObBgxLboowyCXVAGq3y1WQf0= Original-Received: by 10.204.14.202 with SMTP id h10mr4451265bka.182.1296542510095; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 22:41:50 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from localhost ([85.183.18.158]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v1sm10730212bkt.5.2011.01.31.22.41.48 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 31 Jan 2011 22:41:48 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87lj20xxdp.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Mon, 31 Jan 2011 19:10:58 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Score: -3.0 (---) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:76192 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Richard Riley writes: > >> Yes, and thanks for pointing it out. Previously the way was the variable >> I quoted. It can be hard to second guess a variable rename. One could, >> of course, re-read the manual with each pull .. ;) > > You mean you don't?!? > > We can do a deal. If you promise to read the entire manual for every > commit, I promise to document variables/functionality that I plan on > introducing in the source code one week ahead of time. It's a deal. Who knows, with that agreement my spam processing might even start working as I finally notice the correct spam variable or quoting method that's currently making it a non starter. Which reminds me .. I need to retest the issue with emails being reprocessed.