From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/41586
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Michael Cook <michael.cook@cisco.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: gnus-article-unsplit-urls
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2002 12:42:38 -0500
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <g08heq22esx.fsf@zzz.cisco.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0201041642460.16087-100000@slipsten.extundo.com>
	<m3wuyy5aw4.fsf@quimbies.gnus.org> <ilun0zuqavy.fsf@extundo.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035176959 6970 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 05:09:19 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 05:09:19 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: (qmail 29033 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2002 17:43:55 -0000
Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu (mail@129.7.128.13)
  by mastaler.com with SMTP; 4 Jan 2002 17:43:55 -0000
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists)
	by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1)
	id 16MYNX-0004QA-00; Fri, 04 Jan 2002 11:43:39 -0600
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Fri, 04 Jan 2002 11:43:31 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (qmailr@sclp3.sclp.com [209.196.61.66])
	by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA08720
	for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Fri, 4 Jan 2002 11:43:15 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: (qmail 29004 invoked by alias); 4 Jan 2002 17:43:06 -0000
Original-Received: (qmail 28999 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2002 17:43:06 -0000
Original-Received: from funnel.cisco.com (161.44.168.79)
  by gnus.org with SMTP; 4 Jan 2002 17:43:06 -0000
Original-Received: from spamsicle.cisco.com (mirapoint@spamsicle.cisco.com [161.44.172.225]) by funnel.cisco.com (8.8.5-Cisco.1/8.6.5) with ESMTP id MAA25293 for <ding@gnus.org>; Fri, 4 Jan 2002 12:42:39 -0500 (EST)
Original-Received: from zzz.cisco.com (zzz.cisco.com [10.89.5.93])
	by spamsicle.cisco.com (Mirapoint)
	with ESMTP id ADF02965;
	Fri, 4 Jan 2002 12:42:38 -0500 (EST)
Original-Received: (from zzz@localhost)
	by zzz.cisco.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g04HgcM08225;
	Fri, 4 Jan 2002 12:42:38 -0500
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
X-Face: (::$,F}2XQ8GxBqsXCX?#09yY8mkcV?KEWi->CVJP*t3$PVv?E?;Fk34-6ppt@j'g?kWY_[
 d:Xe(0a{$'N_Pv>/P&%U'\V`vimMH`er!2Z&*I]s-MWnUH]Ck+.D!"u`\LtI~'`N@I:o$a<H'+GLC'
 TbN
In-Reply-To: <ilun0zuqavy.fsf@extundo.com> (Simon Josefsson's message of
 "Fri, 04 Jan 2002 18:33:21 +0100")
Original-Lines: 13
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090005 (Oort Gnus v0.05) Emacs/21.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu)
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:41586
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:41586

Simon Josefsson <jas@extundo.com> writes:

> http://foo
> bar baz
>
> That is, do not assume the URL is continued if there is more than one
> word on the second line.  Perhaps?

i think it's common for long urls to be within a paragraph (that was
the case in the message that got me thinking about this issue).  and
so it's common for baz to follow bar on the same line like that.

m.