From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/20706 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Justin Sheehy Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: cl Date: 27 Jan 1999 16:01:50 -0500 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035158948 19165 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 00:09:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 00:09:08 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from karazm.math.uh.edu (karazm.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.1]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA20814 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 1999 16:03:38 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by karazm.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAB15383; Wed, 27 Jan 1999 15:02:26 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Wed, 27 Jan 1999 15:02:40 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id PAA17155 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 1999 15:02:32 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from linus.mitre.org (linus.mitre.org [129.83.10.1]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA20780 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 1999 16:02:11 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from caffeine.mitre.org (caffeine.mitre.org [129.83.10.136]) by linus.mitre.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA12421 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 1999 16:01:51 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (from justin@localhost) by caffeine.mitre.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id QAA04519; Wed, 27 Jan 1999 16:01:50 -0500 (EST) Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Jan Vroonhof's message of "27 Jan 1999 20:10:49 +0100" Original-Lines: 15 User-Agent: Gnus/5.070069 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.69) XEmacs/20.4 (Emerald) Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:20706 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:20706 Jan Vroonhof writes: > Wouldn't it have been much nicer if the map syntax had been > > (mapc list func) so you could just write the nice and pure > > (mapc some-thing > (lambda (var) > ....)) What's wrong with the current mapc syntax? Is there something that you would like other than to have the parameter order reversed? -Justin, confused