From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/11547 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Justin Sheehy Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: compatibility of nnml and MH Date: 10 Jul 1997 10:48:48 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035151239 30976 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 22:00:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 22:00:39 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from sandy.calag.com (root@sandy [206.190.83.128]) by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.6/8.8.6) with ESMTP id IAA15244 for ; Thu, 10 Jul 1997 08:45:41 -0700 Original-Received: from xemacs.org (xemacs.cs.uiuc.edu [128.174.252.16]) by sandy.calag.com (8.8.6/8.8.6) with ESMTP id IAA29676 for ; Thu, 10 Jul 1997 08:42:56 -0700 Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id KAA07338 for ; Thu, 10 Jul 1997 10:42:30 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from claymore.vcinet.com (claymore.vcinet.com [208.205.12.23]) by ifi.uio.no with SMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Thu, 10 Jul 1997 16:48:55 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 16752 invoked by uid 504); 10 Jul 1997 14:48:54 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 16749 invoked from network); 10 Jul 1997 14:48:52 -0000 Original-Received: from linus.mitre.org (129.83.10.1) by claymore.vcinet.com with SMTP; 10 Jul 1997 14:48:51 -0000 Original-Received: from geeky.mitre.org (geeky.mitre.org [129.83.10.221]) by linus.mitre.org (8.8.6/8.8.6) with ESMTP id KAA15866 for ; Thu, 10 Jul 1997 10:48:50 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: (from justin@localhost) by geeky.mitre.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA19854; Thu, 10 Jul 1997 10:48:48 -0400 (EDT) Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Jason R Mastaler's message of "10 Jul 1997 08:16:04 -0600" X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.62/Emacs 19.34 Original-Lines: 26 Original-Xref: altair.xemacs.org dgnus-list:1937 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:11547 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:11547 Jason R Mastaler writes: > The only time the messages will be manipulated my MH is once they are > out of the the nnml group (saved to a new nnmh group). Then you have nothing to worry about. > Stick with nnmh in what sense? As the original spool backend, or > just for those cases where I plan to use both Gnus and MH to > read/alter a group's messages? Just if you plan to use both. For what you've described, your original backend will have little bearing. > I expect to be able to use both Gnus and MH to manipulate those nnmh > groups. That is the intended purpose of nnmh. -- Justin Sheehy In a cloud bones of steel.