From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/11743 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Justin Sheehy Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: [Q] same message in multiple groups & expiry Date: 21 Jul 1997 09:51:10 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035151406 32231 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 22:03:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 22:03:26 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from xemacs.org (xemacs.cs.uiuc.edu [128.174.252.16]) by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.6/8.8.6) with ESMTP id IAA12892 for ; Mon, 21 Jul 1997 08:01:26 -0700 Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id JAA01188 for ; Mon, 21 Jul 1997 09:57:49 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from claymore.vcinet.com (claymore.vcinet.com [208.205.12.23]) by ifi.uio.no with SMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Mon, 21 Jul 1997 15:51:27 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 29299 invoked by uid 504); 21 Jul 1997 13:51:25 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 29296 invoked from network); 21 Jul 1997 13:51:24 -0000 Original-Received: from linus.mitre.org (129.83.10.1) by claymore.vcinet.com with SMTP; 21 Jul 1997 13:51:24 -0000 Original-Received: from geeky.mitre.org (geeky.mitre.org [129.83.10.221]) by linus.mitre.org (8.8.6/8.8.6) with ESMTP id JAA27886 for ; Mon, 21 Jul 1997 09:51:19 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: (from justin@localhost) by geeky.mitre.org (8.8.6/8.8.6) id JAA21577; Mon, 21 Jul 1997 09:51:11 -0400 (EDT) Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Kai Grossjohann's message of "18 Jul 1997 18:24:17 +0200" Original-Lines: 29 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.64/Emacs 19.34 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:11743 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:11743 Kai Grossjohann writes: > (1) Remove the group A copy but keep the group B copy. Mark the group > B copy as read or dormant or something (optional). > > (2) Delete all copies of this message. > - Mark as expirable; does this correspond to (1) or (2), or > something else entirely? Not exactly either. Marking as expirable just marks it as expirable, it doesn't delete. The expiry process will expire any articles that are marked expirable and are older than expiry-wait. This is similar to (1) above. Total-expire removes the need for the expirable mark. With total expire, articles that are marked read and are older than expiry-wait are deleted. -- Justin Sheehy In a cloud bones of steel.