From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/13290
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Justin Sheehy <justin@linus.mitre.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Features before the next millenium
Date: 17 Dec 1997 13:31:13 -0500
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <glmlnxj6cum.fsf@caffeine.rcf.mitre.org>
References: <kigzpmfamz2.fsf@jagor.srce.hr> <m37m9i1qe9.fsf@sparky.gnus.org> <wh3ek67aor.fsf@norne.troll.no> <m3n2i4rz7j.fsf@sparky.gnus.org> <whra7fjd9q.fsf@norne.oslo.metis.no> <kigzpm2g2p9.fsf@jagor.srce.hr> <wh4t4ah8fg.fsf@norne.oslo.metis.no> <ufazpm18zmb.fsf@sina.hpc.uh.edu> <m3g1nt5i8n.fsf@sparky.gnus.org> <m3vhwpjfb3.fsf@hubert.wuh.wustl.edu> <whlnxka1r8.fsf@norne.oslo.metis.no> <glmu3c76dp6.fsf@caffeine.rcf.mitre.org> <86k9d36cyg.fsf@kramer.in.aventail.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035152685 8536 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 22:24:45 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 22:24:45 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: ding@gnus.org
Return-Path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from xemacs.org (xemacs.cs.uiuc.edu [128.174.252.16])
	by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA26371
	for <steve@altair.xemacs.org>; Wed, 17 Dec 1997 10:31:40 -0800
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (root@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA10081
	for <steve@xemacs.org>; Wed, 17 Dec 1997 12:33:32 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id MAJ06659; Wed, 17 Dec 1997 12:32:49 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Wed, 17 Dec 1997 12:32:13 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: from claymore.vcinet.com (claymore.vcinet.com [208.205.12.23]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id MAA06645 for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Wed, 17 Dec 1997 12:32:04 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: (qmail 23683 invoked by uid 504); 17 Dec 1997 18:31:49 -0000
Original-Received: (qmail 23680 invoked from network); 17 Dec 1997 18:31:49 -0000
Original-Received: from linus.mitre.org (129.83.10.1)
  by claymore.vcinet.com with SMTP; 17 Dec 1997 18:31:49 -0000
Original-Received: from caffeine.mitre.org (caffeine [129.83.10.136])
	by linus.mitre.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id NAA17685;
	Wed, 17 Dec 1997 13:31:15 -0500 (EST)
Original-Received: by caffeine.mitre.org (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id NAA01985; Wed, 17 Dec 1997 13:31:13 -0500
Original-To: wmperry@aventail.com
In-Reply-To: wmperry@aventail.com's message of "17 Dec 1997 10:28:55 -0800"
Original-Lines: 25
X-Mailer: Quassia Gnus v0.18/Emacs 20.2
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:13290
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:13290

wmperry@aventail.com (William M. Perry) writes:

> > This is tangential to the real discussion here, but how can a message
> > part[0] be "meant" to be displayed inline?
> 
>   The content-disposition header allows you to specify this.  'inline'
> means simply that it is part of the message flow, not an attachment that
> should just show up as something to be extracted from the message and saved 
> to disk, etc.

Okay.  Conceded.

I only know as much MIME as I need to, so I never really noticed that.

I still see little point in it.

But that's just me.

-- 
Justin Sheehy

In a cloud bones of steel.