From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/12670 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Justin Sheehy Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: GNKSoA Date: 23 Oct 1997 18:20:45 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.106) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035152165 5058 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 22:16:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 22:16:05 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from xemacs.org (xemacs.cs.uiuc.edu [128.174.252.16]) by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA25840 for ; Thu, 23 Oct 1997 16:33:15 -0700 Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA07738 for ; Thu, 23 Oct 1997 18:34:50 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from claymore.vcinet.com (claymore.vcinet.com [208.205.12.23]) by ifi.uio.no (8.8.7/8.8.7/ifi0.2) with SMTP id AAA24252 for ; Fri, 24 Oct 1997 00:20:51 +0200 (MET DST) Original-Received: (qmail 11662 invoked by uid 504); 23 Oct 1997 22:20:50 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 11659 invoked from network); 23 Oct 1997 22:20:50 -0000 Original-Received: from linus.mitre.org (129.83.10.1) by claymore.vcinet.com with SMTP; 23 Oct 1997 22:20:50 -0000 Original-Received: from caffeine.mitre.org (caffeine.mitre.org [129.83.10.136]) by linus.mitre.org (8.8.6/8.8.6) with SMTP id SAA26088 for ; Thu, 23 Oct 1997 18:20:49 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: by caffeine.mitre.org (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id SAA01479; Thu, 23 Oct 1997 18:20:47 -0400 Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Hrvoje Niksic's message of "14 Oct 1997 22:04:19 +0200" Original-Lines: 19 X-Mailer: Quassia Gnus v0.12/Emacs 19.34 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:12670 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:12670 Hrvoje Niksic writes: > Karl Kleinpaste writes: > > Is there any longer a reason why Gnus shouldn't finally and fully be > > declared "GNKSoA compliant"? > > I don't think so. The only reason now is the inertia of the > evaluator. I have sent an updated evaluation to Tim Pierce. -- Justin Sheehy In a cloud bones of steel.