From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/19826 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Justin Sheehy Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Request .... Date: 12 Dec 1998 21:29:28 -0500 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035158106 13622 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 23:55:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 23:55:06 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from gizmo.hpc.uh.edu (gizmo.hpc.uh.edu [129.7.102.31]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA20614 for ; Sat, 12 Dec 1998 21:30:57 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@sina.hpc.uh.edu [129.7.3.5]) by gizmo.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id UAA31751; Sat, 12 Dec 1998 20:30:32 -0600 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sat, 12 Dec 1998 20:29:52 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id UAA18073 for ; Sat, 12 Dec 1998 20:29:42 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from linus.mitre.org (linus.mitre.org [129.83.10.1]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA20573 for ; Sat, 12 Dec 1998 21:29:34 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from caffeine.mitre.org (caffeine.mitre.org [129.83.10.136]) by linus.mitre.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA19166 for ; Sat, 12 Dec 1998 21:29:29 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (from justin@localhost) by caffeine.mitre.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id VAA05747; Sat, 12 Dec 1998 21:29:28 -0500 (EST) Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Lee Willis's message of "11 Dec 1998 10:14:29 +0000" User-Agent: Gnus/5.070065 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.65) XEmacs/20.4 (Emerald) Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Original-Lines: 11 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:19826 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:19826 Lee Willis writes: > To justify this I have a message which contains only a MIME attachment > (A sound file ...) and I wish to reply to the message (To say thank you, > I enjoyed etc. etc.). As it is it makes no sense to reply as there is no > idincation (Other than In-Reply-To: etc headers) of what I'm replying > to. The Subject header doesn't suffice? -Justin