Adaptive Scores do not total correctly

Adaptive Scores do not total correctly

[Graham Murray]

I have noticed a slight problem with adaptive scoring, where the total
score for an article (as reported by V S) does not agree with the
breakdown figures (as reported by V t)

For example, here is the breakdown figure for a particular article I
have just read:-

("lmarks@vnet.ibm.com (Laurence V. Marks)" 312 729065 s)  ->  comp.dcom.isdn.adapt
("lmarks@vnet.ibm.com" 9 729065 s)  ->  comp.dcom.isdn.adapt
("ISDN TA's and OS/2" 240 729065 f)  ->  comp.dcom.isdn.adapt

The total score for this article was only shown as 321, which makes it
look as though the subject scoring has been ignored.  I notice that
the actual subject has "Re: " at the front, but V t counts it but V S
(and the summary display line which I have to show the score of each
article) does not.


This is not isolated, I have noticed it in other groups and with other
articles as well.

Re: Adaptive Scores do not total correctly

[Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen]

Graham Murray <graham@barnowl.demon.co.uk> writes:

> I have noticed a slight problem with adaptive scoring, where the total
> score for an article (as reported by V S) does not agree with the
> breakdown figures (as reported by V t)

I've had other similar reports (usually in connection with fuzzy
scores).  I haven't been able to reproduce it.  Has anybody else seen
this and can debug it?

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  larsi@ifi.uio.no * Lars Ingebrigtsen