From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/9208 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Graham Murray Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: discussion: marking old articles Date: 13 Dec 1996 10:37:22 +0000 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035149267 17071 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:27:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:27:47 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id EAA05979 for ; Fri, 13 Dec 1996 04:32:58 -0800 Original-Received: from barnowl.demon.co.uk (graham@barnowl.demon.co.uk [158.152.23.247]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Fri, 13 Dec 1996 13:15:04 +0100 Original-Received: by barnowl.demon.co.uk (IBM OS/2 SENDMAIL VERSION 2.01/(4.1b) id KAA001.52; Fri, 13 Dec 1996 10:37:23 GMT Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no In-Reply-To: Per Abrahamsen's message of 13 Dec 1996 09:20:54 +0100 Original-Lines: 15 X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.74/Emacs 19.33 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9208 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9208 In article , Per Abrahamsen writes: > Wesley.Hardaker@sphys.unil.ch writes: > > > However, it also marks them as 'R'ead which means > > they will be scored again, unlike the 'O' articles... > > Do you mean adapted? I think if an article is so interesting that you > read it multiple times, it _deserves_ to be counted twice. The way I use it, I do not think that this is always true. The main reason I will go back and re-read (using ^) is to check the context of a quote in the article I am currently reading. So, I would rather not have it adapted scored again.