From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/24428 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Maciej Matysiak Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: is it faster? :) Date: 21 Jul 1999 11:13:56 +0200 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035161995 8626 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 00:59:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 00:59:55 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from farabi.math.uh.edu (farabi.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.57]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id FAA09260 for ; Wed, 21 Jul 1999 05:22:44 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by farabi.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id EAB27436; Wed, 21 Jul 1999 04:19:12 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Wed, 21 Jul 1999 04:19:50 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id EAA12556 for ; Wed, 21 Jul 1999 04:19:26 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from mail.wsc.com.pl (qmailr@mniam.blah.pl [212.244.254.222]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id FAA09248 for ; Wed, 21 Jul 1999 05:18:17 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: (qmail 4034 invoked by uid 666); 21 Jul 1999 09:13:56 -0000 Original-To: ding list Mail-Copies-To: never X-URL: http://phoner.blah.pl X-Blah: junk! X-Disclaimer: my opinions are only mine, not my employer. Original-Lines: 14 User-Agent: Gnus/5.070095 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.95) XEmacs/20.4 (Emerald) Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:24428 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:24428 hello, i've just upgraded from pgnus 0.80 to 0.95 and noticed that everything works faster. checking mail, actions, everything. is it possible or is it just mine imagination? :) or can it be just because i restarted xemacs after 32 days uptime and it doesn't take so much memory and stuff on my poor box (p120/64mb)? somehow happier, m.m. -- use gnus not guns!