From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/35769
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Bjørn Mork" <bmork@dod.no>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Quimby Upgrade
Date: 12 Apr 2001 22:22:29 +0200
Organization: DoD
Message-ID: <hvg0feaxj7.fsf@spip.ws.nextra.no>
References: <m33dbovd9t.fsf@quimbies.gnus.org> <deathsquad.m3zodwy0lq.fsf@socha.net> <m3u244tasf.fsf@quimbies.gnus.org> <20010410162812.7343.qmail@nightshade.la.mastaler.com> <87g0fg56fb.fsf@inanna.rimspace.net> <20010411052354.D46053@kens.com> <87g0fepwkn.fsf@inanna.rimspace.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035171457 4805 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:37:37 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:37:37 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <owner-ding@gnus.org>
Original-Received: (qmail 27507 invoked by alias); 12 Apr 2001 20:22:39 -0000
Original-Received: (qmail 27502 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2001 20:22:38 -0000
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org (195.204.10.139)
  by gnus.org with SMTP; 12 Apr 2001 20:22:38 -0000
Original-Received: (from news@localhost)
	by quimby.gnus.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id WAA12324
	for ding@gnus.org; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 22:22:38 +0200 (CEST)
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
Original-Path: not-for-mail
Original-Newsgroups: gnus.ding
Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: ti30a22-0098.dialup.online.no
Original-X-Trace: quimby.gnus.org 987106958 14112 130.67.149.226 (12 Apr 2001 20:22:38 GMT)
Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@quimby.gnus.org
Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: 12 Apr 2001 20:22:38 GMT
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090001 (Oort Gnus v0.01) Emacs/20.7
Original-Lines: 13
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:35769
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:35769

Daniel Pittman <daniel@rimspace.net> writes:
> On Wed, 11 Apr 2001, Robin S. Socha wrote:
> 
> > At least OpenBSD ships with BIND 4.
> 
> Which has it's bonus points... and it's own suckages. Admittedly,
> though, it's not /nearly/ as bad as Bind 8 (on 9, given the number of
> bug reports I have seen so far).

You should probably get an appointment with an eye specialist.


Bjørn