From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/36384 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Bjørn Mork" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Sender header? Date: 25 May 2001 04:38:45 +0200 Organization: DoD Message-ID: References: <01May23.141128edt.115245@gateway.intersys.com> <01May24.115917edt.115250@gateway.intersys.com> <01May24.143521edt.115214@gateway.intersys.com> <01May24.153439edt.115213@gateway.intersys.com> <01May24.163305edt.115259@gateway.intersys.com> <01May24.172056edt.115272@gateway.intersys.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035171978 8308 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:46:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:46:18 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 2457 invoked by alias); 25 May 2001 02:38:49 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 2452 invoked from network); 25 May 2001 02:38:49 -0000 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org (195.204.10.139) by gnus.org with SMTP; 25 May 2001 02:38:49 -0000 Original-Received: (from news@localhost) by quimby.gnus.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id EAA28066 for ding@gnus.org; Thu, 24 May 2001 04:38:34 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Path: not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnus.ding Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: c4s142h4.upc.chello.no Original-X-Trace: quimby.gnus.org 990671914 7586 62.179.170.4 (24 May 2001 02:38:34 GMT) Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@quimby.gnus.org Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: 24 May 2001 02:38:34 GMT User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/20.7 Original-Lines: 38 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36384 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36384 Stainless Steel Rat writes: > * Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai Großjohann) on Thu, 24 May 2001 > | Really? Why should a login have anything to do with a mail address? > > Because a mailbox is defined as type "addr-spec", which is" > > 3.4.1. Addr-spec specification > > An addr-spec is a specific Internet identifier that contains a > locally interpreted string followed by the at-sign character ("@", > ASCII value 64) followed by an Internet domain. The locally > interpreted string is either a quoted-string or a dot-atom. If the > string can be represented as a dot-atom (that is, it contains no > characters other than atext characters or "." surrounded by atext > > The defacto standard for the locally interpreted string is one's login > name, has been that way for more than 30 years. Sure. But by requiring it to always be true is adding unnecessary restrictions. The RFC doesn't, so why should Gnus? > | Why should a FQDN be (the after-@ part of) a mail address? > > Because a domain-literal is exactly that. > > Together, "login @ fqdn" absolutely identifies the sender given a > reasonably configured system. For some weird definition of "reasonably configured". RFC2822 requires a valid mailbox in the sender field. Can you please point to the specification that guarantees that "login @ fqdn" is a valid mailbox? Bjørn -- I mean, How can you be so primitive?