Re: limit to unseen mark?

[Paul Stevenson <p.stevenson@surrey.ac.uk>]

K Großjohann writes:

> Paul Stevenson <p.stevenson@surrey.ac.uk> writes:
>
>> I think I had the feeling ages ago that class war should be fought on
>> behalf of marks so that they were all of equal status.  Or am I
>> getting confused with Marx?
>
> Right now, there are two columns in the summary buffer.  If you
> change this, then you can't see whether a mail is read and answered,
> or only read, or only answered.

One could still have two columns even if there were no concept of
primary and secondary marks by having two lists of marks; one with
marks to be displayed in the first column and one for those which
should be displayed in the second. Gnus could then consult the list
when generating the display.  No doubt there are other ways to achieve
the same.  Perhaps there are also other problems, though.  I don't
know how vitally the primary/secondary mark scheme manifests itself
elsewhere.

Paul