Gnus development mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Uday S Reddy <u.s.reddy@cs.bham.ac.uk>
To: ding@gnus.org
Subject: Re: New imap Implementation and Keepalive
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 02:01:12 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <i7gt99$j2g$1@dough.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87fwx1npti.fsf@MagnumOpus.khem>

On 9/23/2010 3:42 AM, Charles Philip Chan wrote:
>
> Firstly I want to thank everyone involved for the speedup in the new
> imap implementation. However, I am encountering one annoying problem- it
> seems like the new implementation does not keep the connection alive
> like the old one does. In the old implementation I just need to enter my
> imap password once interactively per Gnus session (I wasn't using
> auth-sources at that time). With the new implementation my imaps server
> (dovecot) drops connection due to inactivity and I need to enter my long
> gpg passphrase again if my pass phrase cache have expired.

I think it is a bit unkind to keep IMAP sessions alive just for the sake of it. 
  The mail server administrators set their time-out policies to make the best 
possible use of resources.  If everybody forcibly keeps their sessions alive, 
the mail servers are likely to run out of connections and refuse new connections.

If the problem is really that the password cache is expiring, it is far better 
to block that instead of trying to tax the mail server.

My two cents.

Cheers,
Uday




  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-09-24  1:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-09-23  2:42 Charles Philip Chan
2010-09-23 16:09 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2010-09-23 19:29   ` Frank Schmitt
2010-09-23 19:45     ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2010-09-23 20:23       ` Frank Schmitt
2010-09-23 20:28         ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2010-09-24  1:01 ` Uday S Reddy [this message]
2010-09-24 12:34   ` Frank Schmitt
2010-09-24 16:34     ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2010-09-25  5:21       ` Charles Philip Chan
2010-09-25  6:14         ` Charles Philip Chan
2010-09-25 13:43           ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2010-09-25 14:07             ` Charles Philip Chan
2010-09-25 14:16               ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2010-09-25 16:01                 ` Charles Philip Chan
2010-09-25 16:14                   ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2010-09-25 17:23                     ` Dave Goldberg
2010-09-25 18:08                       ` Charles Philip Chan
2010-09-25 18:22                         ` David Engster
2010-09-25 17:53                     ` Charles Philip Chan
2010-09-25 17:35               ` CHENG Gao
2010-09-25 19:01                 ` Charles Philip Chan
2010-09-25 22:08                   ` Greg Troxel
2010-09-26  1:59                     ` Charles Philip Chan
2010-09-25 12:52     ` Uday S Reddy
2010-09-24 13:00   ` Charles Philip Chan
2010-09-25 12:59     ` Uday S Reddy
2010-09-25 13:08       ` Rupert Swarbrick
2010-09-25 15:21       ` Ted Zlatanov
2010-09-25 23:03         ` Uday S Reddy
2010-09-25 15:48       ` Austin F. Frank

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='i7gt99$j2g$1@dough.gmane.org' \
    --to=u.s.reddy@cs.bham.ac.uk \
    --cc=ding@gnus.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).