From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/75191 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rupert Swarbrick Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Sending patch with Gnus Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 08:02:43 +0000 Message-ID: References: <871v5i212s.fsf@tux.homenetwork> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1292572995 28594 80.91.229.12 (17 Dec 2010 08:03:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 08:03:15 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M23546@lists.math.uh.edu Fri Dec 17 09:03:10 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PTVHR-0003xH-W2 for ding-account@gmane.org; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 09:03:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PTVHL-0001lk-KY; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 02:03:03 -0600 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PTVHJ-0001lY-Uy for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 02:03:01 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PTVHI-0008If-LN for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 02:03:01 -0600 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PTVHG-0005I8-Gt for ding@gnus.org; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 09:02:58 +0100 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PTVHF-0003ox-Tu for ding@gnus.org; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 09:02:57 +0100 Original-Received: from cpc2-cove3-0-0-cust910.3-1.cable.virginmedia.com ([86.20.35.143]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 09:02:57 +0100 Original-Received: from rswarbrick by cpc2-cove3-0-0-cust910.3-1.cable.virginmedia.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 09:02:57 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 34 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cpc2-cove3-0-0-cust910.3-1.cable.virginmedia.com User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:75191 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Francis Moreau writes: >> More sadly still (and possibly this is me being stupid?), if you >> realise something looks rubbish, the obvious approach of C-k killing >> the group, editing the mbox file and then doing G f again doesn't >> work, because Gnus cleverly caches the emails it seems (when I changed >> the number of emails I was getting the wrong ones!). > > I don't think that's correct. If something need to be corrected, you > shouldn't modify the mbox file but instead fix your patchset inside your > repo and then regenerate the mbox file. Sorry, I wasn't clear. I meant that the text in the cover letter bit (patch 0/n) might have mistakes that one needs to fix which, unless I've misunderstood something, you have to do after calling "git format-patch". Rupert --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iJwEAQECAAYFAk0LGSQACgkQRtd/pJbYVobAbgQAi+ceME1aebNZoc1CINnTjyjB Fbz9W/20QRHeyZHVk28HB8/D4at0ojaELTlttn1ZhSa+UhX5UgYb9oNvdobkz2sM j7mIY0qciYAF+3dsaU8BJFuszUQaI35mNu+9OrBfSjhINUeyjCAvqwYKIsr0VLlx 3gK/v4F96bnKmfGkt7k= =fI2k -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--