From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/75699 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rupert Swarbrick Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Address =?utf-8?Q?`questions=E2=80=8C=40panoramio=2Ecom'?= might be bogus. Continue? (y or n) Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 22:40:10 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87vd1th8ve.fsf@jidanni.org> <87vd1pdiu6.fsf@marauder.physik.uni-ulm.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1295131277 28576 80.91.229.12 (15 Jan 2011 22:41:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 22:41:17 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M24050@lists.math.uh.edu Sat Jan 15 23:41:13 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PeEo4-0007Iy-NV for ding-account@gmane.org; Sat, 15 Jan 2011 23:41:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PeEnT-0005SZ-70; Sat, 15 Jan 2011 16:40:35 -0600 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PeEnQ-0005SL-Dx for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sat, 15 Jan 2011 16:40:32 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PeEnP-0005jl-0G for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sat, 15 Jan 2011 16:40:31 -0600 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PeEnM-0006T6-TS for ding@gnus.org; Sat, 15 Jan 2011 23:40:28 +0100 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PeEnM-0006qn-IC for ding@gnus.org; Sat, 15 Jan 2011 23:40:28 +0100 Original-Received: from cpc2-cove3-0-0-cust910.3-1.cable.virginmedia.com ([86.20.35.143]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 15 Jan 2011 23:40:28 +0100 Original-Received: from rswarbrick by cpc2-cove3-0-0-cust910.3-1.cable.virginmedia.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 15 Jan 2011 23:40:28 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 66 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cpc2-cove3-0-0-cust910.3-1.cable.virginmedia.com User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:75699 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Reiner Steib writes: > On Fri, Jan 14 2011, Tommy Kelly wrote: > >> jidanni@jidanni.org writes: >> >>> Address `questions=E2=80=8C@panoramio.com' might be bogus. Continue? (= y or n) y >>> >>> Better have the message say why: Silly user name? Invisible character in >>> the address? Etc. > > The check includes several expressions that are potentially invalid or > bogus addresses: > > ,----[ M-x customize-variable RET message-bogus-addresses RET ] > | message-bogus-addresses: Hide Value Value Menu List: > | Set: > | [X] noreply > | [X] nospam > | [X] invalid > | [X] duplicate @ > | [X] non-ascii local part > | [X] whitespace > | Other: > | INS > | State: STANDARD. > |=20 > | List of regexps of potentially bogus mail addresses. Hide Rest > | See `message-check-recipients' how to setup checking. > |=20 > | This list should make it possible to catch typos or warn about > | spam-trap addresses. It doesn't aim to verify strict RFC > | conformance. > `---- > >> I agree. I just (for the first time) saw the same message and had no >> idea what it was telling me. > > Feel free to suggest a better wording. > > Bye, Reiner. Couldn't you allow message-bogus-addresses to have (cons "string" "msg") as possible entries. Then message-bogus-recipient-p could return "msg" (if there is one) or T otherwise. Then message-check-recipients could add "msg" to the format call. Rupert --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iJwEAQECAAYFAk0yIk0ACgkQRtd/pJbYVoZxAQP/V9NYIyVK7MXtNGstGY+kweMi 1IoHuGFdcCiKspDPKPH/it2fXtgzp6yFF+51CYAPqlyTSik16p+JXpu5X4DwXu4s 1NWiSJsBctegtsybHbRoHHHzvSp8VN+9j1ix/B1d5dSt8B4oYhzj5QpyotZDWZ5q 7RijYfdzqZ55V9relWs= =ByZs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--